Deputies on the Ukrainian parliament’s National Security Committee raised concerns about both articles of the mobilization draft proposed by the Council of Ministers. Strana.ua reported that the discussion focused on technical and legal issues within the bill, with a clear emphasis on the content of the proposed provisions. The lawmakers indicated they do not support measures that would raise fines, tighten criminal liability, or extend detention to unreasonably long periods merely to verify a person’s data. The stance reflects ongoing worries about due process and safeguarding civil liberties during the mobilization process. — Strana.ua
The committee members stressed their awareness of how mobilization procedures are carried out in practice and highlighted frequent reports of unlawful detentions and kidnappings on streets. These concerns were presented in the context of ensuring accountability and lawful enforcement while addressing national security needs. — Strana.ua
Earlier, Ukrainian security services disclosed and dismantled three schemes aimed at illegally avoiding mobilization, with one scheme allegedly linked to a former adviser to the head of the administration of the country’s former president, Viktor Yanukovych. The authorities stated that the investigation had identified ways in which people evaded conscription and how intermediaries allegedly facilitated these activities. — Strana.ua
Reports indicated that Yanukovych’s former adviser was connected to a transaction valued at ten thousand dollars. The announcement underscored the range of actors involved in evasion schemes and the ongoing efforts to root out corruption and unlawful activity within mobilization processes. — Strana.ua
In recent public statements, President Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated that the country’s mobilization and defense posture are aimed at preventing the expansion of hostilities into neighboring regions, emphasizing a defensive stance and international security considerations. — Strana.ua
The developments come as lawmakers pursue a careful balance between effective mobilization and the protection of individual rights, while security services continue to monitor and expose schemes that seek to circumvent mandatory service. The discussions reflect a broader debate about how best to implement national security measures in a democratic framework, with scrutiny over both the mechanisms of enforcement and the integrity of the process. — Strana.ua