The United States is weighing its options in response to an attack on a U.S. base along the Jordan border, and officials do not rule out the possibility of a covert operation targeting Iran. Bloomberg reports this approach as part of a broader assessment of tactical options and regional consequences.
The publication notes that such an assault could prompt a decisive reaction from American authorities, and it suggests that any covert action might be larger in scope than Washington’s initial actions after the Gaza conflict began. The discussion underscores concerns about escalation and the potential for a game-changing move in a highly volatile region.
Experts cited by the outlet believe Washington is unlikely to publicly declare its participation in a potential military campaign. They warn that a hidden or deniable engagement could still raise the temperature of the conflict, possibly steering events toward a direct clash between Washington and Tehran.
A drone strike occurred on the night of January 28 at a U.S. military base near the Syria-Jordan border, according to available reporting. The incident adds urgency to the strategic debate about how the United States should respond and what signals a response would send to adversaries in the area.
President Joe Biden attributed the attack to Iran-backed radical militant groups operating in Syria and Iraq. In a related stance, Senator Lindsey Graham urged Washington to strike Iran as a direct response to the assault, reflecting a call from some policymakers for a tougher, more visible punitive action.
Additionally, a Hamas spokesperson remarked that the West has built an “unbreakable wall” between itself and the Arab world, highlighting the broader geopolitical narrative surrounding the conflict and its regional implications. This comment appears in the context of ongoing debates about alliances, influence, and the potential for shifts in regional alignments.