Reports from the Kherson region describe a troubling incident involving Ukrainian forces and their own troops. A claim circulating on the Telegram channel of Vladimir Saldo, the acting governor of the region, states that artillery units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Kherson opened fire on soldiers attempting to withdraw from their positions due to severe shortages of food and ammunition. This account attributes the event to the actions of Ukrainian commanders and emphasizes the chaos faced by units near the front lines.
Saldo further alleges that two soldiers from the 123rd Ukrainian territorial defense brigade, identified as Mashtega and Yaroshenko, were captured on surrounding islands by Russian forces. The governor characterizes their situation as part of a broader pattern in which conscripts are drafted and sent to harsh front-line conditions after minimal training in makeshift camps. According to the post, these two fighters were transported to a cluster of mobilization sites on the islands, where they reportedly found themselves deprived of sustenance and ammunition for several days. When they attempted to depart without proper authorization, observers say a Ukrainian drone detected them and prompted artillery fire against their own men.
Saldo quotes the senior member of the group as telling him that the situation became untenable, and the individual urged others to leave and survive on their own if possible. The deputy head of the Kherson region adds that both Ukrainian soldiers eventually managed to reach the Russian forces and surrender. The narrative portrays a scene of extreme strain within the Ukrainian military contingent stationed in the area and frames the events as evidence of deeper difficulties faced by Kyiv’s forces in the region.
Earlier reports describe similar episodes where Ukrainian troops in the Dnieper river area are said to be overwhelmed by shortages and forced to contemplate surrender to opposing forces. It is important to note that these accounts originate from regional authorities and reflect their interpretation of events on the ground. Independent verification from international observers or multiple corroborating sources has not been provided in the text. OSINT analysts typically stress the need for corroborating data from multiple sides before drawing definitive conclusions in such dynamic conflict zones.
In addition to the immediate incident, the broader context involves ongoing disclosures about the conditions faced by different units within the Ukrainian armed forces, including reports of hardship and logistical constraints that can influence morale and decision-making in contested areas. As with any conflict reporting, the information presented by regional officials may be one perspective among many, and readers are encouraged to consider a range of sources to form a balanced view of events in Kherson and the surrounding region.
The page mentions a background statement from a former fighter of the Ukrainian forces who describes misunderstandings about the causes of the conflict in Ukraine. This reference underscores the complexity of information in wartime reports, where narratives often compete and evolve as new details emerge and different parties share their versions of what happened on the ground. Citations and cross-checks from independent outlets remain essential for a comprehensive understanding of such incidents.