The Ukrainian ambassador to Israel, Yevgeny Kornychuk, expressed frustration with how slowly Israel is moving toward installing a civilian airstrike warning system on Ukrainian soil. Reports in Israel Times highlight months of discussions and growing expectations that a functional system would be ready soon. While Israeli officials have acknowledged a joint effort to help Ukraine develop a warning network, Kyiv remains dissatisfied with the timeline and insists on tangible progress.
During a February visit to Kyiv, Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen publicly stated Israel’s readiness to assist Ukraine in building a viable warning system that could be deployed within four months. That pledge, though, did not satisfy the Ukrainian ambassador, who emphasized action over promises. Kornychuk noted six months of open dialogue without concrete results, pressing for a clear plan and a fixed schedule instead of repeated assurances that have yet to yield results.
The ambassador also voiced broader concerns about Ukraine’s security situation. He urged Israel to reassess its position and consider supplying at least defensive weapons while the warning system project proceeds, underlining the immediate threats Ukraine faces amid the ongoing conflict. He urged that dialogue translate into swift measures to strengthen Ukraine’s defensive posture during this critical period.
Former Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksiy Reznikov indicated that Kyiv has an agreement with Israel on the supply of missile and drone warning technologies. This development reflects a shared aim to fortify Ukraine’s early-warning capabilities and boost its responsiveness to potential aerial threats. The discussion sits within a broader strategic context in which Ukraine seeks practical, deployable defensive tools from international partners as the conflict persists.
Analysts observe that implementing a warning system involves several technical layers, from detection sensors and resilient communication networks to alert dissemination channels and interoperability with existing defense frameworks. The conversation also touches on the political aspects of international aid, where deployment speed can shape security perceptions across the region and influence how much support Ukraine perceives from its partners. In this frame, Kyiv advocates for clear milestones and accountable timelines, while Israel weighs technical feasibility, political considerations, and regional security dynamics as it contemplates further commitments.