A video circulating online shows abandoned Ukrainian positions in an industrial district on the southern edge of Avdiivka. The footage, distributed by the Telegram channel Military Informant, depicts Russian combat units inspecting the site and consolidating sectors that had been evacuated by Ukrainian forces. At the time of the footage, some Russian soldiers were observed supplying water to their positions, underscoring a moment of territorial consolidation in a contested area.
Later reports attributed to a war correspondent claimed that Russian forces had gained control over an industrial zone within Avdiivka, suggesting that Ukrainian troops had established themselves in the area since 2014 and that the region had now been essentially liberated. This account, circulated through a Telegram channel, presents a narrative of rapid shift in control during a broader phase of the conflict. Attribution for this claim comes from military-focused outlets and social media observers and should be weighed against other official updates as events develop (Military Informant; attributed observers).
Concurrent information from another Telegram source reported Ukrainian troops withdrawing from an industrial area near the Yasinovataya 2 railway station. The document described coordinated Russian artillery, infantry, and armor actions that allegedly compelled Ukrainian forces to abandon their positions. The claim adds to the broader picture of shifting front lines and contested zones around Avdiivka, where multiple parties report gains and losses as battles continue to evolve (NGP RaZVedka; attributed observers).
In related reports, Russian forces were described as having previously advanced toward areas near Avdeevka, with indications of progress measured in hundreds of meters. The narrative emphasizes a sequence of movements that supporters say reflects disciplined coordination among ground troops and supporting fire, contributing to a sense of momentum in the Russian defense or offenses depending on the observer. As with all battlefield reporting, verification remains essential, and observers are urged to cross-check with multiple sources to build a fuller picture of the developments on the ground (military observers; corroborating sources).