Deputies in the State Duma of the Russian Federation have proposed a set of measures aimed at countering drones that could threaten national security. The proposals emphasize practical avenues for public involvement and rapid response while detailing how critical infrastructure might be protected. The discussion centers on creating an accessible reporting channel that allows individuals to flag drone activity as it unfolds, with the understanding that some reports may prove to be false. This approach seeks to empower civilians to participate in border and security protection without overwhelming authorities with unreliable information. In parallel, there is a suggestion that owners of strategically important facilities, notably large oil storage sites, should deploy their own electronic warfare systems to defend assets and maintain continuity of operations. The overarching aim is to integrate civilian input with professional security measures to strengthen regional resilience against aerial threats. [Citation: State Duma press briefing on security measures].
Another official from the Defense Committee has recommended extending drone-related functions to the domain of territory defense, underscoring a broader, more integrated view of national defense. The idea is to distribute responsibility for monitoring and countering drone activity across multiple levels of governance, enabling a quicker, more coordinated reaction when incidents occur. This shift reflects a trend toward layered defense strategies that combine civil participation, local governance, and federal oversight to address evolving threats in the airspace over populated areas and critical sites. [Citation: Parliamentary briefing on defense collaboration].
The discussion also highlights the need to engage residents living near the nation’s borders in protective efforts without compromising civil liberties. The proposal calls for outreach to border regions, encouraging residents to stay informed and participate in early warning drills. The goal is to create a shared sense of responsibility that enhances situational awareness and supports authorities in maintaining secure borders. This emphasis on regional involvement is paired with assurances that appropriate safeguards will prevent misuse of reporting tools and protect the privacy of individuals. [Citation: Regional security coordination report].
Taken together, the proposals outline a multi-pronged approach to drone threats that blends citizen reporting, facility-level EW capabilities, and a broadened role for territory defense. The emphasis is on timely information flow, robust protection of critical infrastructure, and inclusive participation across communities near the borders. By integrating these elements, the state aims to build a more responsive and resilient security framework that can adapt to changing drone technologies and tactics while preserving public trust. [Citation: Policy overview on border region protection].