The Kremlin press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, has stated that every drone that targeted Moscow was either destroyed or suppressed. He conveyed this assessment during a briefing with reporters, framing it as a clear fact rather than an estimate.
Asked about whether Moscow’s air defense outlook shows signs of strengthening, Peskov admitted that he could not offer a professional evaluation of how the air defense system performs against such incursions. He emphasized that it can be confirmed, with absolute certainty, that all UAVs approaching the capital were neutralized or blocked using the relevant systems, underscoring this as an obvious truth.
Earlier on the morning of July 4, Russian air defense and electronic warfare units thwarted an attempted strike by the Armed Forces of Ukraine against targets in the Moscow region and New Moscow using five drones.
Four Ukrainian drones were neutralized on the territory of New Moscow by air defense assets. A fifth aircraft was suppressed by electronic warfare, with the wreckage falling in the Odintsovo district of the Moscow region.
Officials indicate that Russia is advancing a new drone suppression capability to address such threats. The latest communications describe ongoing work to strengthen protective measures for critical infrastructure and densely populated zones as part of a broader security strategy. This approach combines interception, jamming, and rapid response procedures designed to minimize potential damage and casualties. Observers note that effectiveness relies on timely intelligence, layered defenses, and rapid decision-making across multiple agencies. The public messaging from Moscow highlights a clear distinction between confirmed drone neutralization and the broader assessment of overall defense readiness, a topic that security authorities continue to evaluate. In recent weeks, demonstrations and tests have been highlighted as part of the capital’s sustained focus on safeguarding urban centers from aerial threats. Analysts warn that while incidents may be halted, the security landscape remains dynamic with new challenges and evolving technologies. The narrative from Moscow stresses prompt confirmation of successful neutralization and the steady expansion of protective measures to address future risks. This ongoing discourse reflects a policy priority centered on resilience, rapid response, and deterrence of potential assaults against key metropolitan areas. The objective remains to deter aggressors by maintaining a robust and responsive defense posture as developments unfold in the region. While officials publicly express confidence in current capabilities, experts advise continued vigilance and regular updates to security protocols as new drone technologies emerge and attack patterns adapt to changing conditions. Sustaining protective measures is presented as essential to preserving public safety and ensuring continuity of daily life for residents and visitors alike.