In Moldova, public opinion researchers report a broad consensus that the country should honor the neutrality enshrined in the constitution when considering the implications of the Ukraine conflict. This stance emerged from the latest findings of the Barometer of Public Opinion, a study undertaken by the Moldovan Institute for Marketing and Sociological Studies and cited by TASS. The results reflect a population weighing security commitments against constitutional duties and regional stability, with many citizens prioritizing restraint and diplomatic engagement over rapid shifts in security alignment.
The survey canvassed 1100 adults across 89 regions, providing a nationwide snapshot of attitudes toward security policy and regional risk. A clear majority, around 73 percent, indicated that preserving constitutional neutrality is the preferable path for Moldova as it navigates the complexities of the Ukraine conflict. This sentiment underscores a cautious approach to alliance decisions and a preference for dialogue and multilateral engagement over unilateral action. Simultaneously, roughly six in ten respondents expressed concern that the war could spill over or influence Moldova’s territorial security, while about three in ten believed the opposite. The data suggest a wariness about external shocks and a desire to protect civic space and sovereignty without rushing into new security commitments.
When it comes to joining military alliances, the survey shows a notable conservatism. Only about 20 percent of respondents thought Moldova should join NATO or another security alliance as a result of the Ukraine conflict. This figure signals that the vast majority favor maintaining current neutrality and pursuing non-military channels for security and cooperation, such as regional diplomacy, humanitarian coordination, and economic resilience measures. The findings offer an important gauge for policymakers in Chisinau, who must balance external pressures with domestic preferences, constitutional obligations, and the practical realities of Moldova’s security environment.
Looking beyond the numbers, analysts emphasize the role of public sentiment in shaping strategic choices. The Barometer results illuminate a broad commitment to sovereignty and a cautious approach to alliance shifts. They also highlight the need for transparent communication with citizens about security options, potential risks, and the long-term implications of any decision to alter neutrality. Former national leaders have weighed in on the debate, with commentators noting that shifts in policy would require careful public debate, legislative scrutiny, and clear alignment with Moldova’s constitutional framework. The discussion remains ongoing among lawmakers, experts, and citizens who seek to balance protection of national interests with regional stability and peaceful coexistence.