The incident at Chisinau International Airport on a Friday evening in late June resulted in a serious aftermath that prompted immediate medical care and a formal criminal inquiry. The man who carried out the gunfire was transported to a hospital within the detention center complex after sustaining life-threatening injuries during the attack. Information emerging from official channels indicates that the individual was a Tajikistani citizen, aged 43, and had been barred from entering Moldova prior to the events at the airport. The gunfire left two people dead and another passenger injured, with medical teams providing urgent treatment where needed.
The Moldovan Prosecution Office confirmed the initiation of a criminal case centered on an act of terrorism linked to the armed assault at the airport. The authorities emphasized that the case will proceed under standard procedures to determine motive, state responsibility, and applicable charges.
In parallel updates, the Moldovan Interior Ministry stated that the attacker was a foreign national who had been refused entry into the country. A news outlet reported that the individual had flown in from Turkey before the incident and had not been granted entry authorization. These statements collectively underscore the border security and immigration context surrounding the event.
Officials have highlighted that the situation was managed in coordination with security services, medical responders, and border control authorities. Authorities are continuing to review flight manifests, witness testimony, and security footage to reconstruct the sequence of events and identify any potential accomplices or lapses in process that could be addressed in future safety protocols.
As the investigation proceeds, Moldovan authorities are urging the public to await official updates and to avoid sharing unverified information that could hinder ongoing inquiries. The case has prompted discussions about airport security measures and the handling of individuals who are not permitted to enter the country.
In related historical notes, reports referenced a separate incident from a different country in which a controversial act occurred involving the burning of a religious text. This reference serves only to acknowledge the broader context of reactions to extremist acts and does not imply a direct link to the Moldova case.
Overall, Moldova continues to reinforce its commitment to public safety, border integrity, and rapid, transparent disclosure of facts as authorities pursue a full understanding of the incident and its implications for regional security.