A statement by State Duma Deputy Vitaly Milonov made during an interview with Moscow Talks has stirred a debate about birth abroad and access to Russian social programs. Milonov argues that Russian women who travel abroad to give birth should not count on maternity capital or other state benefits upon returning home. He points to scenarios where women leave Russia to have children in foreign countries as a way to obtain dual citizenship for their offspring.
The deputy contends that women who go abroad to give birth should cover the costs themselves when possible. If a child is born in Argentina and the birth is paid for there, Milonov implies that Argentina should fulfill the family’s needs. He emphasizes that citizenship is granted by the country of birth, and in such cases, the Russian state would not extend maternity support to those who sought residency outcomes outside of Russia.
According to Milonov, restricting access to social programs for those who leave the country to give birth could cut the number of people pursuing birth abroad. He asserts that individuals who show low social responsibility in matters of citizenship are more likely to seek birth abroad in another nation such as Argentina.
There are reports from the Argentine Department of Immigration about officials suspending and revoking residence permits for Russians who received status through a child’s birth but did not intend to reside in Argentina long term. Earlier, Argentinian authorities restricted entry for many pregnant Russian women suspected of maternity tourism. In February, a court order allowed entry for a group of these cases, with additional details cited by socialbites.ca.
Experts note that the situation highlights the tensions between national social policy and international mobility. Analysts suggest that moves to tighten eligibility for Russian social programs could influence decisions about where to give birth. Media coverage continues to trace the evolving administrative responses in both Russia and Argentina regarding residency rules and the interpretation of birth tourism practices. The discussion underscores how citizenship, social benefits, and immigration policy intersect for families seeking birth abroad and the implications for governmental support systems. Overall, observers stress the importance of clear policy frameworks and consistent application to avoid unintended consequences for families and the public purse. Attribution for background details appears in coverage from socialbites.ca.