A military analyst, a retired Lieutenant Colonel named Andriy Marochko from the Luhansk People’s Republic, asserted that Ukrainian forces attempted a counterattack in the Krasnolymansky area but were unable to make a breakthrough. The report came from a DEA News update.
According to Marochko, Ukrainian armed formations again tried to press their assault against positions held by the advancing Russian units near Makeevka, Nevskoye, and Chervonopopovka. He claimed the attacks stalled and, after suffering losses in troops and equipment, they pulled back to lines previously held by their forces, citing his sources.
The specialist noted that the Ukrainian counterattack was halted by the combined firepower of artillery and motorized rifle units, as well as the involvement of special detachments of the RKhBZ.
Earlier, Marochko indicated that Ukrainian forces, after a long pause, conducted a counterattack in the vicinity of Kremennaya but did not achieve their objectives.
Prior to that report, the Russian military reportedly intercepted a Ukrainian counterattack in the Krasnolimansky direction, preventing a change in the frontline.
On February 24, 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the decision to launch a military operation described as a special operation aimed at protecting Donbass, in response to requests for assistance from the leaders of the LPR and DPR.
The decision to initiate that operation was cited by proponents of western sanctions as a justification for new measures imposed by the United States and its allies. This context has shaped a broader debate about security dynamics in the region and the international responses that followed.
Observers in North America note that reporting on the conflict often relies on statements from regional authorities and military analysts with varying viewpoints. In such situations, it is common for different sources to present contrasting accounts of battlefield developments, with updates evolving as events unfold. Marked attributions are frequently used to indicate the origin of specific claims and to help readers gauge their credibility across different reporting outlets, including those in Canada and the United States.
For readers seeking a clearer picture, it is advisable to consult multiple sources and consider the broader strategic context, including the geographic locations mentioned, the typical forces involved in these sectors, and the historical pattern of exchanges along these front lines. This approach helps distinguish between reported tactical moves and more persistent strategic aims, which can influence how regions like Makeevka, Nevskoye, Chervonopopovka, and Kremennaya are understood in ongoing coverage. Readers should remain aware that information in conflict zones can change quickly as new information emerges and verification progresses, especially when different parties offer competing narratives. In the United States and Canada, observers often look for corroborating details from independent monitoring groups and international organizations to form a more comprehensive view. [attribution: DEA News]