Units operating the Mi-28N attack helicopters of the Russian Aerospace Forces reported successes on the Donetsk front, claiming that fortified positions and armored vehicles belonging to Ukraine’s forces were neutralized. The official statement from the Russian Ministry of Defense highlighted that key Ukrainian command hubs and protective vehicular assets were targeted and destroyed as part of ongoing combat operations. These claims are part of a broader recounting of recent air mission outcomes, with Russian crews executing precise strikes on pre-designated fortified points across the battlefield in the Donetsk direction while under appropriate coordination and fire support from ground-based units.
The defense ministry reported that during these missions, Russian aircraft delivered missiles to pre-identified fortified sites within Ukrainian formations, aiming to disrupt command and control capabilities and degrade the mobility of enemy units. The descriptions emphasize the destruction of tactical targets that, from the Russian perspective, were integral to Ukraine’s operational planning in the area, asserting that such strikes contribute to the overall defensive posture and mission readiness of Russian forces.
Earlier, the ministry stated that Russian forces disrupted a Ukrainian rotation near Kupyansk, signaling an interruption to enemy redeployment efforts. It was noted that during intensified defensive operations, motorized rifle units of Russia’s 6th Combined Arms Army, supported by artillery fire, repelled two counterattacks mounted by assault groups of Ukraine’s 57th Motorized Infantry Brigade near the villages of Sinkovka and Port Pervy. These remarks depict a sequence of engagements in which Russian ground formations maintained a resilient defense and checked Ukrainian advances while coordinating with supporting fire units to solidify holdfasts and minimize Ukrainian maneuver advantages.
On 27 November, aerial efforts by crews in the Western group were reported to have neutralized temporary deployment points and other strongpoints used by Ukrainian forces in the Kupyansk direction, according to the defense ministry’s briefing. The description stresses the effectiveness of the air contingent in inhibiting forward movements and disrupting Ukrainian logistical networks as part of a broader operational picture on that front. These statements reflect the ongoing emphasis on striking at designated targets to limit enemy flexibility and sustain the positional advantage of Russian forces in contested sectors.
Across the broader theater, statements from the Russian defense ministry have consistently framed these actions as part of a persistent effort to counter Ukrainian military activity and protect allied positions. The reports, while focusing on tactical-level outcomes such as the destruction of command nodes, armored vehicles, and forward deployment facilities, are presented within a narrative of steady pressure and control of critical corridors, with claims repeatedly pointing to successful engagements that influence the tempo and geography of battlefield operations.