Dmitry Medvedev, who previously chaired the Russian Security Council, argued that weapons supplied by the United States to Afghanistan and Ukraine have found their way into the conflict unfolding in Israel and the Palestinian territories. He expressed these views in a wide-ranging interview with a major news outlet, outlining his assessment of how Western military assistance has been utilized beyond its initial destinations.
Medvedev contended that vast sums were devoted by the United States and its NATO partners to support what he described as a pro-Western government in Kyiv. He also pointed to what he called the heavy loss of equipment during the abrupt withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan, suggesting that a significant portion of those arms did not stay in their intended theaters of operation.
The former security official argued that the cycle of stolen and smuggled armaments—originating in vassal states and ending up with various extremist groups—has become a persistent, almost accepted occurrence in regional conflicts. He described this pattern as a typical outcome of what he characterized as incomplete controls and oversight over weapons shipments.
According to Medvedev, there is a clear linkage between Western-supplied arms and the casualties observed in the Israeli arena. He asserted that American-made weapons, allocated for distant theaters, are now contributing to the violence in the Middle East, a claim he framed as a consequence of broader foreign policy decisions.
Additionally, Medvedev noted that the U.S. Congress publicly pressed for an immediate inquiry into how groups like Hamas could access these armaments. He claimed that Washington often resorts to shifting blame to Iran, Syria, or Russia for the weapon flows, rather than addressing its own supply channels and the governance of those transfers.
Describing such explanations as hypocritical, Medvedev drew on literature to illustrate his point, recalling a famous line about projecting lies while avoiding accountability. He used this reference to lampoon what he sees as a pattern of rhetoric that misleads international audiences while masking real strategic interests.
The Russian political figure underscored his position by reiterating that the hospital attack in the Gaza Strip constitutes a war crime and that the United States would bear responsibility for the consequences. He framed this as part of a broader pattern of support for actions deemed illegal under international norms, highlighting the risk that such support creates for civilian lives in conflict zones.
In his closing remarks, Medvedev implied that the stance of the Hamas leadership resonates with certain foreign policy lines, implying alignment with Moscow’s perspective on regional dynamics. He suggested that the broader international response to these events is influenced by shifting alliances and the strategic calculations of major powers, cautifying that the human costs of these decisions are often borne by civilians rather than policymakers.