In Belgorod, authorities detained Ilya Korenev, a journalist working with the Soloviev LIVE channel. Reports circulated on Telegram that the incident involved a temporary holding while Korenev filmed outside the regional FSB department. The events unfolded as police approached, and observers noted that the journalist’s camera was rolling at the moment of interaction. According to observers on site, the detention was brief and prompted by a routine check rather than any formal accusation. Korenev later indicated that nothing harmful occurred and that he was released after his documents were verified, leaving some questions about the exact nature of the procedure and the safeguards in place for media workers during such activities.
In Perm, November saw a separate incident involving Vladislav Ivanenko, a journalist with the Properm.ru portal. He was taken to a Temporary Detention Center for Foreign Citizens after law enforcement requested a review of his documentation. It emerged that Ivanenko, a Kazakhstani citizen, had received a notification indicating that his residence permit had been cancelled prior to the detainment. The sequence suggested possible administrative complications that can affect foreign journalists working inside Russia, underscoring the delicate balance between journalistic activity and immigration or residency procedures. The episode raised concerns about the treatment of media professionals in transit spaces, and about how such actions are communicated to the public and to the newsroom that relies on their on-the-ground reporting.
Further developments revealed that Ivanenko had traveled to Poland near the frontier with Belarus, prompting speculation about the broader movement of journalists during complex regional dynamics. In parallel, reports confirmed that Mikhail Tkach, a journalist for Ukrainska Pravda, and his cameraman were detained while involved in reporting along the border zone. The detentions underscored the ongoing tensions surrounding reporting in contested or security-sensitive corridors, where border controls, permits, and local enforcement policies can intersect in rapid, unpredictable ways. Newsrooms monitoring the situation noted the critical importance of documenting every step in the process to protect staff and ensure accountability, especially when footage and firsthand testimony are seized or withheld.
Earlier, there were also disclosures about the car of a Russian military correspondent, Saponkov, with authorities mentioning that the door of the vehicle had been opened during a routine search. While details remained sparse, observers stressed that vehicle access and the handling of equipment during searches can have a direct impact on the ability of reporters to cover ongoing events. The cumulative pattern of detentions and vehicle checks points to a broader environment in which journalists must navigate administrative hurdles, travel restrictions, and the ever-present risk of being temporarily detained during field assignments. Across these episodes, the underlying thread is clear: media professionals continue to operate under close scrutiny, with their freedom of movement and access to information often shaped by rapid administrative decisions and security considerations.