Valery Mumindzhanov, who holds the rank of Major General and serves as the deputy commander for logistics in the Leningrad Military District, was brought before the 235th garrison military court in Moscow. The development was reported by RIA Novosti and followed a day of rapid legal movements that drew attention to a high-ranking military official involved in procurement and supply operations.
Earlier in September, law enforcement authorities detained Mumindzhanov in Voronezh and subsequently transferred him to Moscow where the deputy command position within the Leningrad Military District is based. The capture and transfer were carried out as part of ongoing inquiries into alleged irregularities connected with the logistics and supply chain responsibilities held by the officer.
Officials framed the case as criminal, with charges under the subsection relating to taking bribes, particularly on a large scale. The accusation centers on possible abuses related to procurement decisions that could have affected a broad swath of military operations and supply reliability.
Investigators state that Mumindzhanov, identified as the head of the Resource Support Department within the Ministry of Defense, allegedly approved contracts with external contractors for the provision of uniforms and related apparel for troops. The total value of these contracts reportedly exceeded 1.5 billion rubles. According to law enforcement statements, the officer is alleged to have accepted bribes amounting to more than 20 million rubles in connection with these arrangements.
During the course of the inquiry, investigators also examined the broader financial footprint of Mumindzhanov and his immediate family. The inquiry reportedly uncovered real estate holdings in Moscow and Voronezh that, together, are valued at more than 120 million rubles. Officials emphasized that the investigation is examining these assets in the context of the broader case and its potential connections to the procurement activities under scrutiny.
The case has attracted attention at the highest levels, with comments indicating that the Kremlin has been closely following developments related to the arrest and the subsequent legal proceedings involving former deputies tied to Shoigu’s administration. The unfolding judicial process appears to be part of a larger review of procurement practices and accountability within the defense sector.
Observers note that the logistics and resource support function within the military is critical to ensuring operational readiness. When procurement decisions are contested or suspected of irregularities, the entire supply chain can be affected, potentially influencing troop preparedness and the timely delivery of essential equipment. The current case underscores the ongoing focus on transparency, oversight, and the integrity of procurement processes at the highest levels of defense administration.
As the court proceedings advance, officials stress that all parties deserve due process and that findings will be presented through the appropriate legal channels. The outcome of the case may have broader implications for how resource allocation and contract management are conducted within the defense sector, and it could prompt additional reviews of procurement protocols, internal controls, and oversight mechanisms to prevent conflicts of interest in the future.