In the Lipetsk region, a prior air threat regime was withdrawn after unmanned aerial vehicles were detected nearby, a decision announced by Lipetsk Governor Igor Artamonov via his Telegram channel. The notice stated plainly: Weather danger has been cancelled. The cancellations followed a period when the local authorities had activated the protective regime in the morning, roughly around 11 o’clock, as a precaution against potential aerial threats.
Earlier in the day, the drone-attack danger regime had already been disclosed in Voronezh region. That regime had been put in place late the previous night, around 22:26 on March 22, and was subsequently lifted as the immediate threat diminished. Officials indicated that the shift in status reflected evolving assessments of risk and the updated intelligence available to regional authorities.
In separate messaging, it was reported that Ukrainian Armed Forces had conducted operations impacting Kursk region, which resulted in casualties among civilians, including a reported fatality tied to those events. This information came as part of a broader briefing early on March 23, when authorities announced a danger mode again due to the possibility of drone activity in the vicinity. The exact circumstances surrounding the casualty and the ongoing security situation remained under investigation as officials reviewed incoming data and cross-border indicators.
Meanwhile, developments in defense technology continued to unfold. Russian designers had recently introduced an anti-drone system named Stepashka, a device expected to enhance the region’s ability to detect and counter unconventional aerial threats. This addition reflects ongoing efforts to strengthen regional resilience in the face of evolving security challenges, including drone-enabled incursions and other aerial risks that can affect civilian life and critical infrastructure.
Across the broader area, authorities emphasized the importance of staying informed through official channels and maintaining readiness to respond to any renewed threat. Citizens were urged to rely on verified updates from regional administrations and to observe established safety protocols during moments of heightened alert. The swift communication of status changes, from alarm to cancellation, underscored the dynamic nature of threat assessment in border regions where security conditions can shift rapidly.