Labor inspectorate unions are resuming mobilizations after months of waiting for additional staff, a clearer organizational plan, and new resources. Seven facilities have signaled a 24‑day partial shutdown over the coming weeks, with a full stop in the last week of June if the government refuses to enter talks on the unions’ terms.
Supporters of the protests, including CCOO, CIG, Csif, Sitss, Sislass, UGT, and Sess, issued a statement noting that clashes are likely as workers press for improved conditions. Since 2021, the inspectorate has faced irregular scheduling and intermittent mobilizations. The unions seek extra resources and staff to handle IT‑level workloads created by the adoption of new regulations and expanded oversight duties.
Over the past years, the so‑called labor police have gradually integrated responsibilities such as recording working hours, implementing equality schemes, ensuring compliance with new labor standards, and adapting to heightened health and safety measures during the epidemic. These changes are expected to continue shaping daily duties in the near term.
As things stand, the inspection corps totals 2,051 personnel, comprising inspectors and assistant inspectors. This workforce is charged with safeguarding the labor rights of roughly 20.6 million workers who are currently active in the economy. In practical terms, this means an inspector is responsible for monitoring the welfare of about 10,048 workers.
Planned partial strike days include the following dates: 9, 11, 15, 17, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, and 31 May to 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 22, and 23 June. From 24 to 30 June, a strike is scheduled to take place every day within the Labor Inspectorate, signaling sustained pressure for changes in staffing and oversight procedures.
Complaint to the ILO
The facilities indicated they are nearing the finalization of formal procedures to file a complaint with the International Labour Organization, often referred to as the ILO. The basis for this step is the belief that current inspection tools do not allow the State to consistently guarantee proper adherence to labor regulations across all sectors.
Nearly all centers express support for the strikes, with the notable exception of the State Employment and Social Security Sub‑Inspectors, who have chosen to remain neutral. This internal stance carries significant influence within the hierarchy of the inspectorate and has shaped the response to the protests.