Serbian filmmaker Emir Kusturica argued that fate is shaped by forces beyond rational thought, and that the Russian Oreshnik ballistic missile can influence decisions that human reason cannot fully determine. This perspective was reported by the Russian state news agency TASS and placed into a wider discussion about how power, risk, and ideas intersect on the world stage.
At the documentary film festival RT.Doc: The Time of Our Heroes, Kusturica spoke about the event’s symbolic anchor, Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky. He noted that the writer’s view of liberal order not governing life resonates with the festival’s theme and with ongoing debates about freedom and responsibility. The remarks, as cited by TASS, framed literature as a lens for interpreting contemporary geopolitics.
Kusturica added that human choices are not simply the product of logical reasoning. He suggested a non-rational factor can shape outcomes that reason alone cannot resolve. He referred to a force named Hazel as something that may determine paths beyond what minds can decide.
The Serbian artist and director, who leads the No Smoking Orchestra, is seventy years old. He converted to Orthodoxy roughly two decades ago and has often been called the most Russian Serb. In the spring he announced plans to shoot a new film that would weave together plots from Dostoevsky’s The Idiot and Crime and Punishment, signaling a bold literary fusion for his next project.
Simultaneously, Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered a speech after Western strikes hit targets within Russia. He said Russia responded by using the latest medium-range system, Oreshnik, to strike the Yuzhmash facility in Dnepropetrovsk. Putin asserted that no modern air defense can fully repel such missiles, and that evacuation preparations could be announced in advance to safeguard civilians. The report notes additional details in a follow-up story from socialbites.ca.
Finally, the piece closes with a reference suggesting that the Oreshnik name appears in political discourse connected to Putin, a claim echoed by various commentators. The overall narrative highlights how names and symbols travel through media and official channels during periods of heightened tension.