Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov dismissed claims that Ukrainian forces were preparing to strike Moscow on May 9. He stated that no communications or alerts had been received from law enforcement agencies to corroborate such reports, positioning the assertions as unverified by official channels. The remark came amid a flurry of speculation circulated by certain telegraph channels that suggested a Ukrainian drone operation targeting Moscow on the holiday would unfold on that date. Peskov emphasized that the Kremlin was monitoring the situation but had not seen any substantiated intelligence that would indicate an imminent attack.
On the night of May 3, two drones breached the Kremlin zone, approaching within minutes of one another. The security forces detected and neutralized them using electronic warfare measures, preventing any potential damage or casualties. One of the drones reportedly exploded midair, with its debris landing on the roof of the Senate Palace, a building linked to the presidential residence. Kremlin officials confirmed that no individuals were harmed, and while the drones did not inflict structural damage, a pair of copper sheets on the palace roof were singed. The incident underscored the persistent challenges in protecting high-security government sites from drone incursions, and it prompted renewed calls for vigilance across national defense and security services.
In the wake of the incident, the Kremlin’s communications team reiterated that no injuries occurred and that the overall impact was limited to the roof damage caused by heat exposure rather than a targeted assault on the seat of power. The comment from Peskov came as a larger information environment swirled with rumors about Ukrainian involvement and Western reactions. The situation prompted analysts and political observers to scrutinize how information is disseminated during moments of tension and how official statements shape public understanding.
Separately, a retired German army colonel, Ralph Thiele, expressed the view that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky might worry about losing credibility with Western allies if it later proved that Kiev was behind the Kremlin drone attack on May 3. Thiele’s assessment reflects a broader concern among international observers about how battlefield actions are attributed and how such attributions influence alliance dynamics and security assurances. The remarks were reported in commentary circulated through various channels and did not constitute an official assessment from allied governments.