King Charles III appoints a homeopathy advocate as chief medical officer to the British Royal Family
In recent reports, it is noted that the United Kingdom appointed an advocate of homeopathy to lead medical oversight for the British royal household. The appointment followed discussions with royal aides, and it is claimed that the doctor accompanied the monarch on various overseas trips, including visits to Kenya and Germany, as reported by The Sunday Times. The individual named in these accounts is doctor Michael Dixon, a figure who has long merged his medical practice with his support for homeopathic approaches.
According to coverage, King Charles III designated Dixon as chief medical officer for the royal family. The article notes that Dixon and the office staff closely monitored medical care for members of the household and that their formal tenure may have concluded close to the time of Elizabeth II’s passing on September 8, 2022. Dixon, aged 71, led a team of physicians and support staff responsible for the health services provided to the royals at Buckingham Palace and in royal residences during official duties and private engagements alike.
Beyond his royal appointment, Dixon has held a leadership role within the medical community as president of the Faculty of Medicine, a federation that has historically advocated for the inclusion of homeopathic and certain alternative medicine modalities within health care discussions. He has expressed openness to certain herbal medicines being prescribed by the National Health Service for appropriate cases, reflecting a broader debate about integrative medicine in the UK health system. The origin of this stance is described in coverage as emerging from Dixon’s professional experiences and his belief in patient-centered care that considers multiple therapeutic options.
What is noted in the reports is that Dixon reportedly converted to homeopathy after a personal encounter involving a Christian healer who was invited to an NHS clinic. The healer described a method involving the healer placing hands near the patient and moving them slowly while visualizing light passing between therapist and patient. The reports suggest that the patient experienced felt improvements in condition or perception of well-being, even though the specific illness was not formally documented in the case notes. These accounts reflect a broader conversation about the role of complementary practices within mainstream medicine and the importance of patient belief and experience in treatment outcomes. The sources emphasize that such experiences and perceptions should be considered carefully within the context of evidence-based practice and clinical governance, especially in high-profile settings such as the royal household. Sunday Times.