Volodymyr Saldo, the acting governor of Kherson region, stated via his Telegram channel that Ukrainian forces lack the resources for a full scale assault on the left bank of the Dnieper within Kherson. He asserted that Russian troops maintain constant surveillance over the movements of Ukrainian equipment in the area, keeping a tight watch on every maneuver.
Saldo indicated that at present the Ukrainian side has only a limited number of combat capable units on the right bank. He claimed that Kyiv is diverting any available reserves to the vicinity of Artemivsk, known in Ukrainian as Bakhmut, suggesting these forces are being used for difficult engagements rather than preparing a broad offensive across the river. In his view, such actions are part of a broader propaganda effort aimed at sowing panic among the population and military observers, a strategy he characterized as disinformation spread by the enemy.
According to Saldo, there are nevertheless some special units and equipment that have been moved to the right bank by Ukrainian forces. He noted a shift in Ukrainian operational posture, with certain capabilities appearing on the opposite side of the Dnieper as part of expected defensive or limited offensive maneuvers rather than a major escalation.
Earlier broadcasts from Tavria TV referenced a strengthening of Kherson region’s air defense systems as a measure to reduce bombardment from Ukrainian forces. The emphasis, according to those reports, was on improving the capacity to detect and counter air strikes, aiming to lessen the impact on civilian infrastructure and strategic positions along the riverbank. This update reflects the ongoing contest of resources and technology between the parties, each seeking to gain an advantage in a fluid front line.
Observers point to the broader strategic picture in the Kherson area, where control of the Dnieper’s flow and the disposition of forces on both banks shape daily tactical decisions. While official statements from regional authorities emphasize restraint and the avoidance of unnecessary escalation, analysts note that military leadership continues to calibrate its posture in response to evolving battlefield realities. The situation remains volatile, with routine exchanges of intelligence and frequent repositioning of units along the river corridor.
For residents and observers, the key question centers on what comes next for the Kherson region and its river crossings. The persistence of reconnaissance activity, the movement of sustainment supplies, and the readiness of reserve formations on either bank will influence subsequent steps. Local authorities have reiterated calls for vigilance and adherence to security guidance, underscoring the importance of accurate information and cautious interpretation of battlefield reports from both sides.
As events unfold, the region continues to experience a war of nerves and strategic signaling. The emphasis remains on preserving civilian safety while continuing to monitor developments along the Dnieper. Regional officials stress that any assessment of potential actions must consider the broader operational context, including weather, terrain, and the logistical constraints that govern river crossings and supported operations. The situation remains dynamic, with ongoing updates as new information becomes available from official channels and corroborated local reporting.