In the Kherson region, statements emerged about an attack on infrastructure by Ukrainian forces. The deputy head of the regional administration described damage to a bridge spanning the Ingulets River near the village of Daryevka, asserting that seven shots struck the structure. The comments were attributed to Kirill Stremousov and were carried by multiple outlets.
According to the regional official, the strikes were conducted with the aid of American-made HIMARS rocket systems. He noted that the assault was carried out against the Daryevsky bridge, a critical crossing over the Ingulets River, emphasizing the precise impact of the missiles on the targeted object.
The regional side also claimed that air defense fortifications in the area were strengthened in response to the operations, with the intention of intercepting shells launched from the HIMARS systems. The assertion underscored a belief that enhanced air defense could limit the effectiveness of such strikes.
Alongside these details, the former deputy leader of the Kherson region suggested that those responsible for the bombardment were not local forces alone. He insisted that the United States bears responsibility for the use of high-precision rockets in the region, framing the events within a broader geopolitical context.
On a separate report from July, Stremousov claimed that Ukrainian forces had opened fire on another strategic crossing, the bridge over the Dnieper in Kherson, for a second consecutive day. He asserted that eleven of twelve missiles reached their intended target, reinforcing the narrative of sustained aggression in the area.
Historically, the day of February 24 marked a significant escalation when the Russian president announced a military operation in Ukraine, citing requests for aid from the leaders of separatist regions. The decision to begin such an operation prompted new sanctions from the United States and allied nations, shaping the ongoing political and military exchange in the region.
Analysts note that statements from regional officials often reflect a combination of battlefield reporting, strategic messaging, and attempts to influence international perceptions. The ongoing exchanges around the use of modern rocket systems, air defense responses, and the attribution of responsibility illustrate how information is shaped amid active hostilities.