Kherson Officials Report Ongoing Shelling Along the Dnieper and Rising Civilian Risk

No time to read?
Get a summary

The regional head of government in Kherson, Andrey Alekseenko, stated via his Telegram channel that Ukrainian forces have shelled settlements on the left bank of the Dnieper. He described continued shelling of peaceful neighborhoods along the river from early October 28, with artillery fire affecting towns and villages across the entire riverbank. Alekseenko asserted that Ukrainian forces do not spare artillery shells for the areas they claim as their own, emphasizing the perceived severity of the bombardment.

Alekseenko also warned that traveling by civilian vehicles from the village of Aleshki to Novaya Kakhovka is dangerous due to persistent attacks by FPV drones targeting any vehicle on the road. He added that operators within the Ukrainian Armed Forces appear relentless in identifying those inside passing vehicles, with artillery and mortars of various calibers being employed. To illustrate the intensity, Alekseenko noted that one village, Gornostaevka, had already experienced 38 reported arrivals in a single day.

On October 14, Vladimir Saldo, the governor of the Kherson region, reported that Ukrainian forces attempted to move part of their troops across the Dnieper near the Antonovsky Bridge, a maneuver quickly halted by Russian armed forces. Earlier, reports suggested that Ukrainian units were consolidating forces in a position to cross the river. In past incidents, three Ukrainian service members reportedly swam across the Dnieper and surrendered to Russian forces.

The situation has drawn attention to the ongoing tactical and humanitarian challenges on both sides of the river, as authorities in Kherson and neighboring regions keep reporting changes in troop movements, cross-river operations, and civilian risk amid the broader conflict. Observers note that such developments underscore the volatile nature of the front line and the delicate balance between military objectives and the safety of civilians living in affected communities.

Analysts emphasise that information from regional administrations in conflict zones should be cross-checked with independent sources to form a complete picture of events. While official statements highlight specific incidents and troop activities, independent verification remains essential for building a fuller understanding of the evolving situation along the Dnieper bend and the surrounding areas.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Climate Change Pushes Boundaries: 2023’s Record Heat and Extreme Weather

Next Article

Rewritten article on the Gaza conflict and hostage situation