The governor of the Kherson region, Vladimir Saldo, spoke to reporters about the ongoing situation and reaffirmed his confidence that a portion of the territory on the right bank of the Dnieper will be restored under Russian control. He suggested that this objective will be within reach in the coming year, according to coverage from RIA News.
Saldo argued that the right bank of the Kherson region, currently under Ukrainian administration, is considered Russian territory under the region’s constitutional framework. He asserted that its return is certain, regardless of other factors involved in the broader conflict.
When asked whether this objective could be realized in the next year, the governor gave a positive forecast. He stated, in his view, the goal will undeniably be achieved.
Earlier, Evgeniy Balitsky, the head of the Zaporozhye region, expressed a similar level of confidence. He indicated that the special operation might reach its conclusion in the spring or summer of 2024. Balitsky also emphasized that any negotiations with Ukraine would be feasible only after Ukraine’s complete surrender, framing his position as a condition for dialogue.
Balitsky’s remarks come in the context of past declarations in which regional leaders discussed strategic aims and timelines for shifts in control along the front lines. Observers note that the rhetoric from regional authorities often reflects broader policy positions and security considerations that shape public discourse within the conflict zone.
It is important to recognize that there have been various statements over time regarding military and political plans, including references to reserve service members and the role of foreign allies in regional defense. Analysts remind readers that such statements may reflect strategic messaging intended to signal resolve and to influence both domestic audiences and international observers.
Overall, the comments from Saldo and Balitsky illustrate ongoing expectations among some regional officials about rapid changes in territorial control, even as the broader international situation remains fluid and subject to negotiation, mobilization, and evolving military dynamics. [Citation: RIA News]