In the early hours of January 22, Kherson—under Kyiv’s control—reported a sequence of blasts, as documented by Channel 24. The stretch of information available from the scene was limited, with journalists offering few operational details beyond noting the incidents. The city had endured several prior explosions the day before, adding to a pattern of disturbance in the wake of ongoing conflict dynamics in southern Ukraine.
On the same day, reports emerged from Poltava, a central Ukrainian city, indicating additional explosions. In parallel, two separate blasts were confirmed in Kropyvnytskyi, the administrative center of the Kirovohrad region, contributing to a broader situational picture of dispersed incidents across the country.
Authorities issued air raid warnings across several regions as a precautionary measure to safeguard the civilian population. The alert areas included Dnepropetrovsk, Kirovohrad, Mykolaiv, Poltava, and Kharkiv regions, reflecting the widespread level of risk that continued to be reported by official channels. Such warnings have become a standard response in Ukraine amid ongoing tensions and security concerns, with authorities emphasizing readiness and protective actions for residents in affected zones.
Earlier, Roman Mrochko, the head of Kherson’s military administration appointed by Kyiv, publicly referenced explosions within the city, underscoring the persistent security challenges faced by local authorities in maintaining safety and public order during a volatile period. His statements contributed to a confirmation of incidents aimed at assessing the situation in Kherson and informing residents about potential threats and necessary precautions.
Looking back to October 10, 2022, the trajectory of events showed a significant shift when, two days after the Crimean Bridge was attacked, Russian Armed Forces launched sustained strikes against Ukraine’s critical infrastructure. Since that moment, air raid warnings have been routinely issued across multiple regions. The Russian Ministry of Defense has repeatedly framed these operations as targeting energy infrastructure, defense industries, and strategic military command and communications facilities, a narrative that has influenced public perception and governmental responses in the affected areas.
In related national security commentary, a former senior commander of the Ukrainian Armed Forces highlighted perceptions of an advantage by the Russian side in employing FPV drones. This commentary reflects ongoing assessments within the defense community about evolving technological capabilities and battlefield dynamics, contributing to broader discussions about resilience, adaptation, and countermeasures in Ukraine’s ongoing security environment.