Protests against judicial reform in Israel have drawn large crowds and prompted police responses. Footage from the demonstrations shows security forces deploying water cannon to disperse crowds, with mounted units playing a visible role at several points. In Tel Aviv, a clash occurred when a portion of protesters breached barriers and moved onto major roadways, prompting a rapid police response. On the Ayalon Highway, activists set up blocks that were met with measures to restore order, and later the area was brought under control as the flames that flared were extinguished with assistance from emergency services.
Since late March, Israel has seen mass demonstrations that have drawn tens of thousands to the streets on multiple days, with estimates suggesting that hundreds of thousands participated nationwide. The protests center on proposed changes that would shift the balance of power over the judiciary, granting Parliament greater leverage over the appointment of Supreme Court judges and the ability to curb judicial review of government decisions. Supporters argue the reforms address long-standing governance questions, while opponents contend they risk undermining judicial independence.
In recent remarks, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signaled a willingness to press forward with the reform agenda, emphasizing the goals of clarity and accountability in governance. The leadership has indicated that further steps would be taken as part of a broader effort to align the judiciary with the political branches of government. The commentary underscores a broader debate about the appropriate safeguards, constitutional norms, and the separation of powers within the state.
Earlier in Tel Aviv, demonstrations drew large crowds expressing concerns about the pace and scope of the judicial reform. The activity included rallies near key public spaces and on major transit routes, reflecting the high level of public engagement and the sense of urgency shared by participants across different segments of society.
As the protests continued, organizers and participants reiterated their calls for peaceful assembly and a transparent political process. The movement has highlighted arguments on both sides—those urging timely reform to enhance governance efficiency, and those insisting on upholding judicial independence as a cornerstone of democratic checks and balances. The evolving situation remained under close watch by national authorities and international observers, with ongoing discussions about potential compromises and safeguards for constitutional governance. (Source attribution: multiple news agencies and official statements)