Informing the public, raising awareness, and driving change. This is the premise of a published study conducted by researchers from the University of California, Occidental College, and Claremont Graduate University in the United States. The research demonstrates that a simple conversation about the effects of excessive meat consumption can have direct, measurable effects on actions to address climate change.
Earlier research has shown that meat production and related activities account for roughly 15 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, and that reducing consumption to about two hamburgers per person per week could significantly curb global warming. Building on this foundation, researchers Andrew Jalil, Joshua Tasoff, and Arturo Vargas Bustamante explored how disclosure of this information might influence public eating habits.
To test this, in the fall of 2017 researchers recruited 213 students and randomly assigned them to two groups. In the first group, volunteers received a 50‑minute presentation about the environmental downsides of meat consumption, covering forest clearing for grazing land, the large amounts of water required to raise cattle, and the methane emitted during cattle life cycles.
Added to this were explanations of the negative health consequences associated with high meat intake, such as a greater risk of heart disease.
In contrast, volunteers in the second group listened to a different talk that did not address food or diet.
Visible and lasting results
Over the three years following the intervention, researchers observed the students in the school cafeteria, where the program influenced roughly 100,000 meals. The findings showed that participants in the first group reduced beef consumption by 11 percent, poultry by 9 percent, and fish by 9 percent compared with their usual diets. At the same time, there was a 20 percent rise in vegetable dishes.
The researchers noted that the change in dietary behavior persisted over the three years studied and did not revert to previous patterns. Questionnaires indicated that 82 percent of students in the first group reported changing their meat consumption habits, with 64 percent attributing the change to climate concerns and 33 percent citing health considerations.
The authors concluded that informative interventions can be cost-effective and drive durable shifts toward more sustainable food choices.
Referenced study: attribution to a Nature Food publication (summary available within the academic literature).
End of document.