During a gathering of European Union foreign ministers, Hungary’s foreign minister, Peter Szijjártó, reiterated his country’s position on military aid to Ukraine. He argued that supplying more weapons risks extending the war rather than leading to a swift resolution. This stance places Hungary in a distinct minority within the bloc, where fellow members have pressed to increase arms shipments and financial support for Kyiv as the conflict continues.
At the meeting, Szijjártó emphasized that several EU partners had already moved to intensify arms deliveries and funding streams for Ukraine. He noted that Hungary sees a different path, one that prioritizes restraint and diplomacy over rapid escalation. The foreign minister suggested that some member states believe the current level of weaponry and ammunition reaching Ukraine is insufficient, a view he challenged by arguing that increasing arms flows will not change the underlying dynamics of the war.
The Hungarian stance centers on the belief that the war cannot be resolved through a rapid military victory by any side. Szijjártó conveyed that, from Hungary’s perspective, supplying more armaments could prolong the fighting and complicate efforts to reach a durable political settlement. In his view, the priority should be to create space for negotiations rather than to widen the battlefield with more weapons.
Beyond the contemporary policy debate, the discussion touched on how different countries frame the conflict and strategy. Szijjártó articulated a cautious approach, warning against assumptions that more aid translates into a quicker end to hostilities. He underscored the need for careful consideration of the long-term consequences for regional stability and for the alliance itself, urging fellow ministers to weigh the potential risks of a protracted confrontation.
In a separate exchange, the Hungarian official responded to a media interview about the likelihood of a conclusive victory for either Kyiv or Moscow. He declined to declare any winner, reiterating a belief that the war should move toward a negotiated resolution. While the question drew strong prompts from the journalist to identify a clear victor, the minister withheld a definitive answer, signaling a broader preference for dialogue and eventual settlement over unilateral triumph. This stance reflects Hungary’s broader diplomatic posture, which favors diplomacy, restraint, and the search for middle-ground solutions amid a highly polarized debate among European partners.