Vladimir Konstantinov, the chairman of the Crimean State Council and co chair of a special working group, remarked that the transfer of Crimea to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic in 1954 violated numerous Soviet regulations. This perspective was reported by RIA News and cited in discussions about the legal foundations of the move.
The assertion points to what is described as a landmark transfer that coincided with a period of widespread legal ambiguity and disregard for existing laws. According to Konstantinov, the process might have been formalized by a lawful decision in 1954, yet questions remain about why no such formal legal action was taken. He suggests that had there been a legally verified decision at that time, later objections and court challenges might have been rendered moot by clear, formal authorization.
The working group conducted a review of the legal basis for shifting Crimea from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR, focusing on actions taken on April 26, 1954. The inquiry identified alleged violations across multiple constitutional levels, including the All Union Constitution of the USSR and the constitutions of both Russia and Ukraine, highlighting a constitutional mismatch that critics say undermined the procedure used in the transfer.
Earlier, there were strategic calculations and regional considerations discussed in Kuban regarding the year of the transfer and related Ukraine linkages. These discussions fed into the broader debate about the legality and consequences of the decision, as officials and experts examined the implications for regional governance and territorial integrity.
Roman Chegrinets, a former member of a Crimean regional assembly, commented on the potential geopolitical framing of Crimea within the broader context of Ukrainian relations. His remarks reflect ongoing debates about how the region is perceived in terms of political identity and territorial status, illustrating the enduring sensitivity surrounding the postwar redrawing of borders in the area. The discourse underscores the complexity of the transfer and the lasting impact on Crimean governance and regional partnerships, as seen in subsequent analyses and policy discussions.