A disturbing thread runs through multiple messages attributed to a man later accused in a murder case. Phrases such as I will kidnap you, sinkieres let’s do something rough sex, I’m waiting for you in my bed, or Kiero. Eating you. Xixi. Depilao appear in the record. The text is written exactly as reported, with the presumption that the author of the diary opted to preserve the original spelling and grammar errors of the alleged serial killer. David SO reportedly directed Wafaa Sebbah, ten years younger, through Instagram in the months before her death. During the period of harassment, he pressed for sexual contact that she refused, signaling a broader pattern of coercion and manipulation. The legal case suggests this is part of a network of behaviors from someone who harassed and pursued an intimate relationship despite clear disinterest from the victim.
The statements underscore a persistent harassment with a sadistic sexual component that underpins the rape and murder being investigated. A 17-page analysis from the Criminal Behavior Analysis Section of the Civil Guard, a profiling unit modeled after early FBI techniques, has previously been cited by this newspaper. While the report was disclosed recently, it is expected to inform the private prosecution brought by the victim’s family through their attorney. The Valencian lawyer Jesús Ruiz de Valbuena contends that one of the charged offenses is a hate crime under Article 150 of the Criminal Code.
Harassed and insulted Wafaa because she was a woman and North African
Exclusive reporting from Levante-EMV, part of the Prensa Ibérica group, notes that the provisional indictment frames the family’s central demand as seeking a permanent prison sentence that can be reviewed. Even as he offered or insinuated affection, the victim consistently refused access to such advances. The messages included demeaning references directed at Wafaa’s identity as a woman and as a person of North African heritage. Communications captured in Instagram chats reportedly included phrases suggesting disdain for her origins and culture, and references to violence against individuals associated with the region.
The record also shows insults aimed at dissuading the victim from continuing the relationship, including sexual coercion and belittling language. The material reflects a pattern of demeaning language and aggressive pursuit, with a troubling blend of sexual and ethnic hostility recorded across conversations. Testimonies collected during the judicial process corroborate the sequence of harassing messages and the escalation of hostility toward Wafaa.
No acceptance of refusal: threats and verbal abuse
The attorney for Wafaa highlights several threatening and humiliating statements attributed to David S. O. in response to her refusal of his advances. Among the cited phrases are expressions that degrade her voice and agency, including crude insults and gendered animosity. The dossier also references explicit phrases about money, sexual preferences, and control, illustrating a coercive pattern rather than a single misstep.
Questions about the motive surface as investigators compare the alleged actions to other instances described in the case files. The reliance on a specific verb used in a separate confession has raised questions about the offender’s intent and personal motive, suggesting a broader psychological profile. The case indicates that the violence extended beyond the act itself, affecting relationships and personal safety for others connected to the victim.
In a parallel development, sources note that the defense has been focused on presenting a comprehensive view of the suspect’s behavior while maintaining that the evidence should be weighed within the broader context of the investigation. Legal authorities are scrutinizing the evidence to determine whether charges reflect multiple facets of the crime, including the protection of a potential unborn child, which led to additional counts under the homicide statutes. The ongoing proceedings remain a focal point for families seeking accountability and for the judicial process in handling crimes that intertwine gendered violence with ethnic hostility.