In Valencia, the family of Marta Calvo expressed a mix of relief and gratitude as the popular jury returned a guilty verdict regarding the death linked to the case surrounding Marta Calvo. The mother, identified here as Burón, spoke to reporters moments after the court’s decision, praising the outcome and acknowledging that the verdict would keep the accused, Jorge Ignacio Palma, from escaping accountability. She conveyed that the verdict meant justice for her daughter and for herself, noting that she would still have her daughter in memory even as the person who caused the tragedy would be kept behind bars. The statement, made to the press, reflected a profound sense of validation for a family that had endured intense public attention and emotional strain throughout the proceedings.
Burón appeared outside the Valencia City of Justice alongside her lawyer, Pilar Jové, and was supported by close relatives and friends who joined in celebratory gestures and remarks of satisfaction over the jury’s decision. The family’s mood was candidly described as one of happiness, with the crowd’s response echoing the sentiment of many who had followed the case closely. The mother emphasized that the verdict represented more than a legal formality; it symbolized a moral reckoning in a case of serious harm and loss.
During a brief moment of reflection, the parent spoke of the last communication Marta had sent, interpreting it as a sign of the difficult path that led to this day. The message, she indicated, conveyed a sense of certainty about the outcome and a hopeful anticipation that the truth would prevail. The emotional weight of the moment was palpable as she expressed the belief that Marta would ultimately receive the recognition she deserved in the full judicial process.
The legal representative for Marta Calvo commented on the jury’s unanimity, attributing the verdict to the strength and clarity of the evidence presented. He asserted that there was no exculpatory material, no contradictory expert testimony, and no alternative theory offered that could undermine the facts as established by investigators. The attorney argued that the narrative presented to the jury aligned with the investigative findings and the documentation that supported the asserted version of events.
As the proceedings concluded, the attorney reflected on the ongoing process of justice, expressing confidence in the jury and the system while noting that the next step would be the sentencing phase. He stated that the outcome was a testament to the thoroughness of the investigations and to the diligence of those involved in presenting the case before the court. The attorney also thanked the media for their attention to the story and commended the Civil Guard for their professionalism and hard work during the investigation and the subsequent legal process, recognizing how essential those efforts were to reaching this point in the case. The family and their supporters left the courthouse with cautious optimism, ready to face the next chapter of legal proceedings and the implications of the verdict for all parties involved, while the community continued to follow developments closely as authorities prepared for the formal sentencing.