The Krasnoyarsk garrison military court issued a verdict that has drawn attention to a case involving a former teacher from the Siberian State University of Science and Technology named after Academician MF Reshetnev. The court sentenced him to ten years in a penal colony, a punishment that reflects the severity of the charges he faced. The ruling was reported by TASS, confirming the detailed findings of the judicial process.
According to the verdict, the accused was found guilty under multiple provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. He was charged under Part 3 of Article 290, which covers bribery by an official for illegal acts, and under Part 2 of Article 291.1 in connection with the acceptance of bribes. In addition, the court affirmed other related allegations, culminating in a sentence that aligns with the documented scale of financial corruption involved in the case. The total amount involved exceeded eight hundred thousand rubles, a figure the court deemed substantial enough to warrant a penal sentence of this length.
The proceedings also detailed a sustained period of illicit activity. From 2015 through 2019, the accused accepted payments from nineteen students. The bribes varied in size, ranging from ten thousand to one hundred ten thousand rubles for each student, and in exchange the defendant granted favorable academic outcomes by awarding high grades. Crucially, the individual did not perform standard checks on the students’ knowledge, which allowed the pattern of favoritism to persist unchecked. In a further layer of complicity, the defendant acted as an intermediary, channeling portions of the bribes to colleagues, thereby extending the misconduct beyond a single act and implicating others in the scheme.
As part of the enforcement of state revenue rules, the court ordered the confiscation of five hundred thirty thousand rubles from the defendant, directing these funds toward the state budget. This measure underscored the judicial stance on the use of public office for personal gain and the commitment to reclaim ill-gotten assets as part of the punishment.
Background details in the case indicated that the accused earlier held a position as an associate professor at the University of Voronezh. Reports on the case noted that the individual was brought to court for accepting a bribe from a student, a development that later formed part of the broader criminal charges. The proceedings described the defendant as a forty-year-old teacher who faced the possibility of significant consequences under Article 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, reflecting the seriousness with which such offenses are treated within the Russian judicial system. The case illustrates the persistent problem of corruption within higher education and highlights the role of university administrators and instructors in maintaining integrity and accountability. The outcome sends a clear message about zero tolerance for bribery and about the expectation that public educators uphold ethical standards in their professional duties. The combined elements of the charges, the evidence presented, and the final sentence collectively demonstrate the courts’ commitment to addressing corruption, protecting students, and safeguarding the integrity of academic institutions.