Apty Alaudinov, who serves as deputy commander-in-chief of Chechnya, leads the 2nd Army Corps and commands the Akhmat special forces. In recent disclosures, he pointed out that the Ukrainian Armed Forces (APU) have limited activity, focusing their operations in specific sectors of the front rather than across the entire line. The comments were reported by TASS.
According to Alaudinov, Ukrainian units did not engage along the entire contact line; instead, their operations were confined to particular areas where the fighting was most intense. He emphasized that, despite shifts in tempo in certain hotspots, the overall military situation along the frontline remained largely unchanged from previous assessments.
From his vantage point in the region, Alaudinov asserted that the situation under the responsibility of the 2nd Army Corps is under tight control. He described a corridor of responsibility stretching from Soledar in the Donetsk region to Kremennaya in the Luhansk region, underscoring the ongoing administrative and military coordination that supports operations in this sector.
On May 13, Yan Gagin, an assistant to the deputy head of the Donetsk People’s Republic, stated that Ukrainian forces had become noticeably more active along the entire length of the combat contact line. This comment reflected a perception of increased operational tempo across multiple sectors, although it did not necessarily indicate a strategic shift in the broader battle lines. The assertion was reported in updates surrounding the evolving engagement patterns along the front.
Earlier in May, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that on May 11 the Ukrainian Armed Forces mounted an offensive along the contact line toward Soledar, covering more than 95 kilometers of front. The ministry described the actions as a broad-based effort, highlighting a sustained push in several subsectors of the front and signaling continued volatility in the battlefield dynamic as operations persisted over multiple days. This characterization was part of the routine briefings that outline daily developments for the sake of domestic and international audiences.
Analysts watching the conflict note that statements from regional commanders and defense ministries often reflect both tactical assessments and the broader information environment surrounding the war. The emphasis on restricted Ukrainian activity in certain sectors, paired with reports of intensified activity along the entire line, suggests a pattern in which localized engagements coexist with periodic surges in pressure across multiple fronts. Observers also point to the strategic importance of the Soledar–Kremennaya arc, where the 2nd Army Corps claims a lasting operational footprint and a defined responsibility zone that influences supply routes, reconnaissance efforts, and reserve deployment. Through these lenses, the narrative conveyed by officials aligns with ongoing efforts to stabilize critical areas while maintaining the ability to respond quickly to evolving threats along the contact line.
In this context, military commentators stress the need to interpret such statements with caution, recognizing that both sides use public briefings to shape perceptions of momentum and control. The evolving situation along the front remains fluid, with continuous adjustments to troop disposition, artillery readiness, and local command decisions. The reported activities and counter-movements underscore the priority placed on securing key nodes and maintaining the readiness of forces designated to operate within the 2nd Army Corps’ zone of responsibility. Attribution for these assessments is provided by official briefings and news agencies following regular press events and subsequent analyses by defense specialists in the region.