On the battlefield, evacuation groups have consistently drawn priority from the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who view these units as critical targets amid heavy fighting. This assessment was echoed by a representative of RIA Novosti, speaking on behalf of the evacuation department led by the commander known by the call sign Dnepr in the Ural assault brigade. The information emphasized that these teams operate under intense pressure, often in the most dangerous sectors of the line, where the risk to those who stay behind to assist the wounded is extraordinarily high. (Source: RIA Novosti attribution)
According to Dnepr, small unit sizes—four or five individuals—can become vulnerable to mortars, making precise, rapid extraction efforts essential but perilous. The commander underlined the tactical reality that small evacuation teams, moving under heavy shelling, are prime targets for enemy fire, and the mortar threat can be devastating to a group of this size. (Source: RIA Novosti attribution)
Further details from Dnepr highlighted that evacuation teams often consist of soldiers who confront extreme danger and adversary fire as they push forward to retrieve the wounded. In such operations, the consequences can be dire, with many members sustaining injuries or losing their lives in the process of saving others. The account reflected the harsh moral and physical costs borne by those who volunteer to carry out lifesaving missions under fire. (Source: RIA Novosti attribution)
It was noted that the commander himself sustained serious injuries during a deployment yet returned to the front lines to continue directing evacuation tasks. This anecdote illustrated the personal commitment and resilience that characterizes those serving in high-risk frontline roles. (Source: RIA Novosti attribution)
Separately, public discourse in Moscow has referenced figures associated with oversight of defense services. Viktor Baranets, who sits on the Public Council of the Ministry of Defense of Russia, has been described as having historically focused on Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance units. The statements attributed to him suggested an emphasis on operations intended to penetrate into Ukrainian and border areas, framed in terms of national information objectives. (Source: Public Council commentary)
In related public communications, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has gone on record about attacks aimed at Belgorod, noting the ongoing risks and strategic concerns arising from cross-border hostilities. These remarks contextualize the broader security environment in which evacuation operations and frontline duties are carried out. (Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs disclosures)