The European Parliament is advancing measures that would compel companies to prove that many products sold in the European Union are not produced on land that has been deforested or degraded. The plan also broadens coverage to include meat and paper products, expanding the range of goods subject to tighter monitoring.
In a strong show of support, the vote yielded 453 in favor, 57 against, and 123 abstentions. Parliament outlined its position for forthcoming negotiations with EU member states, aiming to reassure consumers that their purchases do not contribute to forest loss. The coverage and urgency highlighted in the discussions underscore the political momentum behind the regulation.
The Commission first introduced the proposal in March, listing items such as palm oil, beef, soybeans, coffee, and cocoa, along with various wood products and derived goods. The target is the main drivers of deforestation, with leather, chocolate, and furniture identified as notable contributors in impact assessments.
Lawmakers floated adding pork, sheep and goat meat, poultry, corn, and rubber to the scope, and suggested shortening the deadline for removing products linked to deforested land from markets by one year. The clear objective remains to ensure goods sold in Europe do not fuel forest loss or harm native biodiversity.
Respect for human rights
Beyond safeguarding ecosystems, the Parliament pressed to extend verification to ensure that products entering the European market are produced with respect for human rights and the rights of Indigenous peoples. This adds a social dimension to the due diligence process, aligning supply chain checks with broader ethical standards.
Images of deforestation and the ongoing debate over forest stewardship frame the policy’s ambition. The discussion emphasizes that the aim is not to ban goods or exclude countries, but to employ tools such as satellite monitoring, on-site inspections, supplier training, and isotope testing to verify origin and provenance. The approach prioritizes practical enforcement over punitive bans.
Greenpeace welcomed the Parliament’s move, applauding clearer definitions of deforested and degraded land and the broader product categories affected. The organization underscored that a wider set of products, governed by transparent criteria, can lead to stronger forest protection outcomes. The position reflects a demand for robust, science-based standards that safeguard ecosystems while supporting responsible trade practices.
Both co-legislators are ready to start negotiations with the Commission and will engage in tripartite talks in the coming weeks to finalize the regulation text. The process will involve reconciling the Parliament’s and the Council’s positions to reach a consensus that can guide market practices across the European Union.
In the broader environmental policy landscape, the proposed regulation signals a move toward accountability in commodity supply chains. It recognizes the links between land use, biodiversity, and the livelihoods of communities dependent on forests. As negotiations unfold, stakeholders from industry, civil society, and member states will seek a balance between strong safeguards and practical on-the-ground implementation.
Analysts note that implementing rigorous verification mechanisms will require investment and cross-sector collaboration. The policy framework envisions a mix of technological tools, field checks, and transparent reporting to create a traceable chain of custody for key commodities. The overarching aim is to ensure European consumption patterns do not contribute to forest loss or ecosystem degradation while preserving fair access to global markets for producers who comply with the rules.
With evolving market and regulatory dynamics, the focus remains on clear, enforceable standards and measurable outcomes. The negotiation timeline will be watched closely by producers, retailers, and environmental advocates who want tangible progress in protecting forests and supporting sustainable development across regions that supply goods to Europe.
Environment department contact details are not provided in this rewrite for privacy and policy reasons.