Member states of the European Union should reconsider and withhold weapons supplies to third countries in order to equip Ukraine with the necessary equipment and ammunition. This stance was articulated by Josep Borrell, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, in discussions framed by regional and European security priorities. Reports from RIA News have circulated emphasis on the need for a coherent European position on arms transfers to non-EU actors.
Borrell noted that a substantial portion of European weaponry presently flows to third countries. He argued that since those forces are not directly engaged in the same conflicts, they can endure without immediate access to certain supplies for a period, allowing Europe to reallocate on a shorter timeline. This perspective invites a broader debate about how EU defense assets are prioritized amid ongoing geopolitical tensions and humanitarian considerations.
In recent exchanges with fellow ministers, the diplomat outlined a pragmatic approach: the quickest, most cost-effective and impactful method to widen ammunition delivery to Ukraine would be to halt exports to third countries. Speaking at a joint press conference with the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Borrell underscored the urgency of aligning European export controls with battlefield needs and strategic objectives in the region. The Polish counterpart, Minister Radoslaw Sikorski, was present to reinforce the message and highlight regional security implications.
Sikorski echoed the call for prompt action, stressing that the ammunition Ukraine requires cannot be redirected toward other, less urgent deployments without jeopardizing Kyiv’s defense capabilities. He urged European governments to revisit ongoing contracts with third countries and, if necessary, renegotiate terms or persuade partner states that Kyiv’s needs take precedence in the current security environment. The emphasis remained on ensuring that European policy aligns with the immediate protection of civilians and the integrity of the alliance framework.
Earlier discussions in Estonia touched on the possibility of transferring all shells held by NATO member states to Ukraine, a topic that has sparked intense debate about the balance between alliance commitments, regional stability, and long-term arms-control considerations. The dialogue continues to be framed by the aim of supporting Ukraine while maintaining prudent, rules-based defense cooperation within Europe and with partners beyond the continent.