The Spanish Minister of Science, Diana Morant, has publicly defended the completion of the Midcat gas pipeline. She argued that delaying the project is not a matter of opinion but a practical step to ensure Europe does not face an energy shortfall in a fragile, high-risk energy landscape. This stance was voiced amid questions about opposition to the pipeline’s completion in Valencia, a topic that surfaced this Friday as Podemos member Javier Sánchez Serna raised concerns a day earlier. Morant emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating that the current climate demands concrete, actionable measures to secure energy supply for citizens across the continent.
Morant pointed to the broader geopolitical pressures that affect Europe’s energy outlook. She highlighted what she described as aggressive tactics from Russia, including coercive actions against Ukraine, which she characterized as a form of blackmail that threatens European democracies and their energy systems. In her view, Europe must respond with a coordinated approach that leverages every available tool to guarantee reliable energy access for households and essential services.
In her remarks, Morant argued for a strategic framework that enables smooth energy transport and exchange among European nations. She called for solidarity among member states and stressed the importance of building interconnected energy networks that can withstand political and market disruptions. The goal, she said, is to ensure a resilient energy system that supports citizens, industry, and critical infrastructure during times of crisis. Morant urged policymakers to pursue practical solutions that strengthen regional cooperation and diversify energy sources, while remaining mindful of environmental and economic considerations.
The discussion around the Midcat project reflects a broader national and continental debate about energy independence, market stability, and the means by which Europe can reduce dependency on external suppliers. Proponents argue that completing the pipeline will enhance cross-border energy resilience and help stabilize prices, especially during periods of volatility. Critics, meanwhile, raise questions about cost, timing, and the long-term policy direction for energy infrastructure in a rapidly changing energy landscape. Stakeholders note that the outcome will have lasting implications for energy security, European integration, and regional development in places like Valencia and beyond. Proponents insist that an integrated European energy network is essential for safeguarding households and employers that rely on steady energy supplies to power daily life and economic activity. [Citation: European energy policy analysis, 2025]