A drone was heard over a Moscow house on Profsoyuznaya Street during an incident described by Evgeniya, a resident who watches the TV channel 360. The event unfolded in the early hours, and the sounds carried through the quiet morning air, turning an ordinary night into a moment of uncertainty for those awake and listening closely to the city wake up.
According to the witness, she lives on the 14th floor, while preliminary information places the drone on the 16th, near the same residential block. There was no loud blast in the moment of impact, but the sound of the drone striking a wall was clearly audible. The hum of the rotor blades cut through the building, a mechanical reminder that the city’s skyline can become a scene of disruption in an instant. Evgeniya described hearing the drone’s continuous buzz, a sound that hovered over the street and then seemed to vanish as quickly as it had appeared. The timing of the incident was around 05:00, a still hour when most people are tucked away, yet the drone pierced the quiet with its unusual presence.
Reports from Moscow’s authorities and officials indicated that there were no casualties as a result of the drone activity in the capital. Former Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin shared on his Telegram channel that several buildings did suffer minor damage, and that emergency services from the city were immediately on the scene to assess the situation and determine any further steps. The quick response from city services reflected the usual readiness to handle unusual emergencies that can arise in a large urban environment. The information suggested that while damage occurred in a few locations, it was not catastrophic, and the focus shifted to securing the affected areas and understanding the nature of the threat and the drone’s origin.
Another account from a resident living on Leninsky Prospekt described a separate incident wherein a drone attack took place without an explosion or loud noise. The person recalled that around six in the morning, guards initiated an evacuation for occupants, signaling a precautionary measure to safeguard residents in the area. The evacuation action underscored the seriousness with which authorities treat any suspected aerial threat and the need to move people to safety while the situation is clarified. The account from this resident continued to emphasize the absence of a blast and the comparative calm that followed in many parts of the building as people prepared to relocate, awaiting further information from officials.
A second resident shared impressions upon arrival, noting that the sounds resembled a distant motorcycle and a pair of sharp, consecutive claps. This description highlighted how drone activity can manifest in a range of auditory cues, from steady hums to abrupt, staccato noises that echo through stairwells and hallways. The accumulation of testimonies from multiple witnesses illustrates how memories of such events can vary yet collectively point to a common thread: an aerial intrusion that disrupted the night’s routine without the expected explosion, leaving residents with questions about what happened, why it happened, and what it means for the safety of their neighborhoods.