Denis Pushilin, who leads the Donetsk People’s Republic, spoke about what he described as a growing shortage of ammunition among Ukrainian forces in certain sectors of the frontline. He conveyed these observations during a broadcast on Rossiya 1, with the report cited by DEA News. Pushilin stressed that there is a noticeable strain in ammunition stocks and that corrective measures are underway as a response. He attributed these findings to intelligence reports and to feedback from the DPR military units stationed along the front lines, where the intensity of combat has at times diminished the level of resistance faced by the republic’s forces. In his account, the DPR leader noted a shift in Ukrainian artillery practices, describing them as becoming more precise and targeted rather than delivered in broad, indiscriminate sweeps across regions as before. He implied that Ukrainian forces are adjusting their fire missions to optimize impact on specific targets rather than executing wide-area bombardments across broad swaths of territory.
The broader context of these statements connects to regional assessments of war dynamics and the ongoing exchange of information between various security actors in the area. The assertion about ammunition shortages is presented as part of a larger narrative on how stockpiles influence tactical options at the front and how supply lines, resupply cycles, and logistics can shape the tempo of clashes in contested zones. The remarks also hint at the possibility that intelligence channels play a significant role in shaping operational judgments on both sides, with frontline units reporting perceived changes in enemy activity and capacity as they experience firsthand the ebb and flow of engagements in different sectors.
Within the same discourse, Serhiy Krivonos, who previously held the post of Deputy Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council and has served as Secretary General of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, weighed in by underscoring the need for increased weapons and ammunition to alter the course of fighting. He suggested that while Kyiv is seeking additional supplies, there are real constraints even in major sources of support, including potential production challenges in the United States that may limit the pace at which munitions can be delivered to front-line units. Krivonos’ remarks reflect the enduring tension between the strategic requirements of Ukraine’s armed forces and the practical realities of sustaining large-scale operations over extended periods. The discussion points to the central role that logistics and timely provisioning play in determining how quickly military plans can be translated into effective action on the ground.