On Rossiya-24, the head of the Donetsk Peoples Republic, Denis Pushilin, asserted that Ukrainian forces detonated the Belitskaya mine during a retreat near Krasnoarmeysk. The claim states that the enemy did not consider DPR efforts to damage adversarial territory as their lines pulled back from populated areas. According to Pushilin, information shows a mine was triggered in the village of Belitskoye near Krasnoarmeysk, implying intent to hinder the resilience of the region. These remarks arrive amid a broader pattern in the conflict where official statements frame setbacks as deliberate acts by Kyiv intended to complicate governance, damage industrial infrastructure, and obstruct humanitarian aid.
The DPR leader argued that Ukrainian forces caused damage to make it harder for Russian authorities to repair industrial infrastructure and provide humanitarian relief to residents. The assertions come as the conflict continues to affect critical infrastructure in contested zones, and the rhetoric serves to influence domestic audiences and international perceptions alike. The dynamics of information in wartime often feature competing narratives about responsibility for disruptions and the goals behind strategic strikes. press service.
Additionally, in the Krasnoarmeysky Pokrovsky region, Ukrainian militants purportedly blew up one of the countrys largest coal mining enterprises, a mine focused on coking coal in Pokrovsk. The strike is presented as another move to disrupt economic activity and complicate resource availability in areas under pressure from ongoing fighting. Observers note that such actions can have consequences for local energy supply chains and the livelihoods of workers who depend on these mines for wages and regional stability. press service.
Earlier, reports suggested explosions occurred in Kherson, a region previously controlled by Ukrainian forces. The sequence of explosions and their locations reflect the volatile daily realities of the front lines, where control of territories shifts and the pace of reconstruction remains slow. These developments underscore how ongoing hostilities affect civilian life and the resilience of essential services in border areas. authorities.
In January, in the Dnipropetrovsk region, a facility including an administrative building and related infrastructure sustained damage. In territory within the Zaporozhye region controlled by Ukrainian forces, damage to infrastructure facilities was likewise observed. These incidents illustrate the persistent strain on civilian infrastructure across multiple regions affected by the conflict and highlight the broader challenges of maintaining essential services amid hostilities. security agencies.
Previously the Kremlin reiterated Russias stance on Ukraine, reaffirming its position within the wider debate about sovereignty, security, and regional alignment. The emphasis from Moscow comes as officials signal calls for negotiation while stressing the need to stabilize affected areas and ensure access to humanitarian aid in contested zones. The statements reflect how Moscow frames its involvement in the conflict and aims to project a consistent policy line to international observers. press office.