In a recent Bitrix24 survey, nearly half of Russian company representatives expressed a willingness to offer higher pay to employees who can leverage artificial intelligence tools at work, provided certain conditions are met. The core finding, as interpreted by socialbites.ca, underscores a growing recognition of the value AI can bring to daily tasks and project outcomes when used effectively and responsibly.
Survey participants described the conditions under which salary increases might be granted. They cited measurable boosts in productivity, improved outcomes, and the removal of repetitive or time-consuming routines as key motivators. Some respondents also suggested that employees could allocate personal time to enhance their skills with AI tools, thereby increasing their overall contribution to the company. This reflects a mindset where value is tied to tangible performance gains rather than mere tool familiarity.
On the other side, a notable portion of respondents—47.7%—expressed opposition to raising pay for AI-enabled work. Their rationale centers on the belief that modern staff should already possess the capability to work with AI assistants and that tool selection should primarily fall to the employee. They emphasized that broad efficiency, not just access to tools, should drive compensation decisions. This segment also highlighted that the responsibility for choosing the right AI tools rests with workers themselves and that practical results ultimately count more than the mere adoption of technology.
A minority, 4.8%, argued for paying less, arguing that AI could produce a generation of workers who become lethargic or overly dependent on automation. They suggested that any premium should go to managers who actively motivate and shepherd teams toward the productive use of modern tools, rather than to employees simply for possessing access to AI capabilities. This perspective points to the importance of strong leadership and accountability in realizing AI-driven efficiency gains.
Separately, there is reporting indicating that about 15% of spine surgeries involve some form of assistance from artificial intelligence. This statistic, noted in industry discussions, reflects ongoing experimentation with AI applications to support decision-making, planning, and precision in complex medical procedures. While not directly connected to the workforce compensation discussion, it illustrates the broader trend of AI integration across sectors and the varying levels of impact across roles and disciplines. (Bitrix24 study, summarized by socialbites.ca)