The Russian authorities have again added Ukrainian journalist and television host Dmitry Gordon to the wanted list, according to official records. Gordon, a prominent figure known for conducting high-profile interviews with politicians, artists, and entertainment personalities, is cited in the Russian Internal Affairs Ministry database as being sought by law enforcement. This update was reported by the state news agency as part of the department’s updated search registry. —
The ministry’s entry identifies Gordon as Dmitry Ilyich Gordon, born in 1967 in Kyiv, Ukraine, and notes that he has been re-announced as a wanted person. The document does not provide further details about the charges or the precise basis for the renewed search. —
Officials indicated that Gordon could again be placed on the wanted list if investigators file a new criminal case. The database does not reveal what kind of lawsuit or accusation might be involved, leaving uncertainty about the current prospects of a new prosecution. —
Gordon has previously surfaced on Russia’s wanted list, with the first announcement occurring in mid-July 2022. Subsequently, the Russian Ministry of Justice added Gordon to the register of individuals deemed foreign agents in September of that year. —
Earlier that year, the Investigative Committee signaled potential charges against Gordon related to several provisions of the Criminal Code, including calls to incite war, incitement of hatred based on nationality, and the dissemination of information about the actions of the Russian armed forces that could be construed as false or misleading. —
In a live televised broadcast on a Ukrainian channel, Gordon reportedly urged an armed operation against Russia, including the use of nuclear weapons. He has routinely posted content on his YouTube channel critical of Russia and its leadership. Gordon has also described himself as a personal adversary of President Vladimir Putin. —
When asked about the motivations or background of such calls, critics have pointed to Gordon’s history of outspoken commentary on political and military matters, arguing that his public statements could be interpreted as support for actions contrary to official policy. His supporters, meanwhile, contend that his reporting and commentary reflect a strong commitment to journalistic independence and a willingness to challenge power structures. —
The ongoing case dynamics illustrate the tension between media figures who operate across borders and the legal frameworks that govern wartime conduct and information in conflict zones. Observers note that the status of Gordon’s case may evolve as new evidence emerges or as international responses shape possible legal actions. —