The growing role of digital technologies in judicial processes is transforming how justice is accessed, making court systems more open to citizens, reducing paperwork, and speeding up case consideration. This perspective was highlighted by the President of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, Irina Podnosova, during the Forum of Presidents of the Supreme Courts held in Sochi with BRICS member states in attendance. The event in Sochi brought together leaders and jurists to discuss how digital tools can support fair and efficient judicial administration across diverse legal traditions.
Podnosova noted that when courts enable remote interaction with the public, it marks a significant shift in the conduct of legal proceedings. Digital channels allow plaintiffs, defendants, and witnesses to participate without the need for frequent physical appearances, which can broaden access to justice and reduce delays caused by travel and scheduling constraints. This shift aligns with contemporary court practices that prioritize user-friendly interfaces, clear guidance, and timely responses, all of which contribute to a more transparent justice system.
She pointed to concrete capabilities introduced by modern technologies, such as automated case assignment and mandatory audio recording of court sessions, as examples of how digital tools can strengthen judicial independence and adherence to the rule of law. Automatic distribution helps prevent human biases in caseload management, while audio records provide a verifiable and auditable trail of proceedings, supporting accountability and the integrity of judicial decisions.
The discussion extended to the broader aims of digitization, which include safeguarding the dignity and rights of all participants in the judicial process, improving protections for victims, and ensuring fair treatment of defendants. Podnosova argued that these principles are essential for the development of contemporary legal orders. By embracing digital solutions thoughtfully, courts can better balance efficiency with procedural guarantees, ensuring that access to justice remains both broad and robust.
In addition to national reforms, the forum emphasized international cooperation and the harmonization of BRICS member state legislation. Experts and judiciary leaders explored how common standards and interoperable practices can facilitate cross-border case handling, evidence sharing, and mutual legal assistance while respecting each state’s legal traditions and sovereignty. The exchange of views during the forum is seen as a practical step toward aligning legal frameworks in ways that support consistent, fair, and timely justice across participating countries, and it signals a shared commitment to strengthening judicial trust.