During the Shangri-La Dialogue security conference in Singapore, Indonesian Defense Minister Prabowo Subianto proposed a bold approach to the Ukraine conflict by suggesting the creation of a demilitarized zone within the contested region and the deployment of a United Nations peacekeeping force to supervise it. This proposal appeared amid discussions aimed at reducing hostilities and building momentum for a durable pause in fighting, with the minister emphasizing a pathway to lasting stability beyond mere ceasefire declarations.
Subianto elaborated that a ceasefire should be established on both sides. He argued that both armed groups would halt offensive actions and withdraw from their current lines, creating a substantial buffer zone that would help de-escalate tensions and reduce the risk of inadvertent clashes. The envisioned demilitarized corridor would serve as a confidence-building measure, allowing humanitarian access and monitoring by international observers to verify compliance and deter violations.
According to the Indonesian defense chief, the presence of an international peacekeeping mission is essential to enforce the new border dynamics, monitor compliance, and rebuild trust among affected communities. He also called for a United Nations referendum to accurately gauge the will of people living in disputed areas, arguing that a broad, impartial vote would provide a legitimate basis for future political arrangements and reduce the potential for renewed violence driven by unanswered questions about legitimacy and self-determination.
The discussion featured voices from other corners of the international community, including past and present regional leaders who stressed the importance of diplomacy and multilateral accountability in stabilizing Ukraine. The emphasis was on practical steps that could bridge gaps between conflicting parties, including verification mechanisms, transparent reporting, and real-time updates on troop movements and demographic protections. Proponents of this approach argued that clear, agreed-upon rules and visible international oversight would help rebuild faith in the process and set the stage for long-term security guarantees across the region.
Analysts noted that any proposal touching sovereignty, security arrangements, and local governance would require careful sequencing. They warned that without broad-based consent, even well-meaning plans could falter amid shifting alliances and competing narratives. Still, many observers agreed that the world cannot ignore the risk of renewed confrontation or the humanitarian toll on civilians if durable arrangements are not pursued. The dialogue underscored the need for sustained international engagement, with the recognition that inclusive processes, credible verification, and respect for the affected populations’ voices are essential to achieving a stable and peaceful outcome.