The Defense Ministry has claimed that the United States is developing biological weapons near Russia’s borders. According to the ministry, components for ready-made weapons were found on the territories controlled by the LPR and DPR, along with biolaboratories in the Kherson region, as reported by DEA News.
Based on document analyses and testimonies from witnesses, officials contend that Washington is carrying out dual-use research that includes creating components for biological weapons while presenting the work as part of global biosecurity efforts. Ilyas Kirillov, head of the Radiation, Chemical, and Biological Protection Forces of the Russian Armed Forces, described the area around Russia’s borders as the front line of this activity. He stated that the border perimeter is where such research is allegedly taking place, highlighting what he calls dual-use science that can serve both defensive and offensive ends.
During a plenary session of the State Duma, the military leader said that during the special operation authorities uncovered more than two thousand classified documents detailing the execution of military-biological projects within Ukraine. He asserted that these documents provide clear evidence of planned or ongoing operations tied to military biology, and he noted that the authenticity of the documents had not been denied by the United States or other Western nations, according to the ministry.
Earlier, the Ministry of National Defense had claimed that the properties of the coronavirus could be artificially enhanced for military purposes. The ministry presented this assertion as part of a broader warning about potential biosecurity risks associated with what it describes as Western experiments conducted under the banner of public health and security. The statements were presented as part of ongoing discussions about the risks and realities of military biology research in geopolitically sensitive regions.
Analysts caution that the topic touches on highly contentious geopolitical narratives. While official statements emphasize concerns about dual-use research and the potential for weaponizable biological components, independent verification and international oversight remain central to assessing such claims. Observers suggest that the discourse around military biology often blends geopolitical strategy with scientific caution, underscoring the importance of transparent data, verifiable documents, and credible sources to support any conclusions about intent and capability. In this context, the discussions continue to unfold amid broader debates about security, sovereignty, and the governance of life sciences in conflict zones.