The spokesperson for the Western military group’s press center, Serhiy Zybinsky, reported that several days ago the army neutralized four Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance units. He shared this in a video released through the Telegram channel affiliated with the Russian Ministry of Defense.
In his briefing, Zybinsky claimed that two attempts by Ukrainian forces to reestablish units in the Novomlynsk and Novoselovskoe regions were thwarted. He also asserted that Russian air and ground forces targeted Ukrainian strongpoints in the Gorka sector, with Ka-52 and Mi-28 helicopters striking areas where personnel, weapons, and military hardware were concentrated.
According to his account, an ammunition depot near Bochkovo was destroyed by artillery shelling from enemy Msta-B howitzers, contributing to what he described as a broader interdiction of Ukrainian supply lines and logistics hubs.
Earlier, updates from the Russian defense authorities cited daily losses for Ukrainian forces along the Kupyansk direction, with figures of up to ninety-five soldiers reported. The same briefing noted that eight Ukrainian vehicles, along with an Akatsiya self-propelled artillery unit and an American M777 howitzer, were destroyed in a single day in that corridor.
On February 24, 2022, statements from the Russian leadership explained that a special military operation in Ukraine was ordered in response to requests for assistance from the heads of the Luhansk People’s Republic and the Donetsk People’s Republic. This decision was intended to address security concerns cited by these authorities and to support what was framed as a protective intervention.
The ensuing conflict precipitated a complex international response, with Western nations imposing sanctions and reviewing security arrangements across the region. The described events reflect ongoing engagements and countermeasures typical of front-line activity in a high-intensity conflict, where control of terrain, logistics corridors, and air superiority play critical roles for both sides.
Observers note that the narrative presented by official sources often emphasizes successful strikes and disruptions to enemy forces, while independent verification in such volatile theaters can be challenging. The information flow in this context is shaped by strategic communication aims, differing operational updates, and the broader geopolitical stakes, which include alliance dynamics and sanctions regimes that influence both military planning and diplomatic channels.
In any such situation, movements by troops, the timing and effectiveness of air defense and artillery engagements, and the status of supply and repair facilities are closely watched by international observers. Analysts stress that the fog of war can lead to conflicting claims, and cross-verification is an essential part of understanding the true impact on the ground.
As the conflict persists, ongoing reporting from both sides and from third-party observers continues to shed light on shifting front lines, the resilience of supply networks, and the broader humanitarian and political implications of sustained military operations in the region.