A resident of Yaroslavl described an experience at a local children’s clinic where pediatricians reportedly conduct examinations at six-minute intervals. The account was shared in the VKontakte community “Free Yaroslavl 2:0” and picked up by news outlet 76.ru as a public post. The woman who spoke about the visit noted that the doctor arrived for a scheduled examination at 18:06 on January 11. She said that as they approached the office, she asked who had been seen last, and learned that tickets or appointment slots were issued every six minutes. This rapid sequence sparked concern about the length and quality of the consultation.
According to the account, the patient’s case did not require extensive time, as the visit involved discharging a child after sick leave. Still, in Yaroslavl, others in similar situations might face longer waits or more time-consuming evaluations depending on the case. The woman questioned whether such a short duration is adequate for achieving an accurate diagnosis, recommending appropriate treatment, and conducting a proper examination. She stated that they entered the office only about ten minutes later than the allotted time, expressing frustration at the perceived schedule pressure.
Many public followers reacted with outrage over what they saw as insufficient time between consultations and doses. The regional Ministry of Health responded by saying the clinic did not violate official scheduling guidelines. They explained that the recommended standards allocate up to 15 minutes per patient; however, the ministry emphasized that standard time benchmarks are advisory in nature and are intended to help determine whether medical personnel have enough time to complete essential tasks.
Another strand of discussion involved a report from a person originally from Moscow who claimed a dispute with doctors at the clinic over Covid-related matters. The incident highlighted broader debates about patient flow, service quality, and safety protocols in pediatric care across the region. While the ministry’s stance centers on advisory timing rather than fixed penalties, the public concern underscores the demand for transparent scheduling practices and consistent care in children’s health services.
In summary, the case has drawn attention to how appointment pacing can influence the perceived thoroughness of pediatric examinations. It also raises questions about how clinics balance patient volume with the need to provide careful assessments, diagnoses, and follow-up recommendations. As regional health authorities monitor practices, patients and families are likely to continue seeking clarity on what constitutes adequate appointment time and how clinics can maintain both efficiency and high-quality care. Source: 76.ru.