The opening line of a groundbreaking study warns that the lives and health of billions hang in the balance today. It states that global warming could shave about six months off the average human lifespan.
The paper, published in the journal PLOS Climate, explains that health problems arise from direct effects of higher temperatures and more frequent natural disasters such as floods and heat waves, as well as indirect environmental changes that influence respiratory and mental health in communities around the world.
The research team from a major science and social science institution examined how climate change could influence life expectancy. They describe life expectancy as a key indicator used to measure the overall health status of a population.
A conceptual framework was developed to map both direct and indirect pathways by which climate change affects health. This approach addresses a topic that has not been fully explored before in this way.
The study analyzed cross-country data from 191 nations spanning 1940 to 2020, using GDP per capita to account for economic differences between countries when estimating the impact on life expectancy.
The results show that a 1°C rise in average annual temperature is associated with a 0.44 year drop in life expectancy at birth, roughly 161 days. Higher temperatures also interact with changes in precipitation to magnify negative health effects over time.
When the composite climate-change index, which accounts for both temperature and precipitation shifts, climbs by 10 points, life expectancy at birth decreases by about 0.50 years. That is roughly six months.
Women are more affected than men
The study notes that women experience a larger decrease in life expectancy from climate change compared with men, with the elderly, children, and residents of developing regions facing the greatest risk.
The report emphasizes the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to evolving conditions to limit health risks. It calls for urgent action to curb rising global temperatures and protect population health amid a warming climate.
To complement broad strategies, the researchers suggest more localized studies that focus on severe weather events such as forest fires, tsunamis and floods, whose impacts may not be fully captured by temperature and precipitation data alone.
The global threat posed by climate change to public health underscores the urgency to treat it as a health crisis. The study highlights the immediate need for adaptation and resilience-building to protect human health as temperatures rise.
The report stresses that resilience investments, disaster preparedness, and stronger healthcare infrastructure are essential to reduce health risks associated with climate change.
Limitations of the study
The researchers acknowledge important limitations in estimating climate-change impacts, especially when scenarios involve fluctuations in both temperature and precipitation.
They note that in some situations, increases in temperature coupled with decreases in precipitation may blur the ability to separate the contributions of each factor. The use of a geometric mean might oversimplify the nuanced effects of rising temperatures and changing rainfall on the overall climate picture, potentially underestimating the severity in some cases.
The report also points out that when temperature falls or precipitation rises, the geometric mean may fail to clearly reflect the complex dynamics at work. It cautions that the index can misrepresent the subtle shifts in climate stability and the chances of extreme events.
In cases where both temperature and precipitation remain near typical levels, the geometric mean might not effectively distinguish the absence of extreme changes, potentially overstating sensitivity to unusual shifts. The authors call for additional indicators or adjustments when assessing climate stability.
A reference note appears at the end of the document, signaling ongoing scholarly work in this field.
This study contributes to the growing understanding of how climate variables intersect with health outcomes and emphasizes the need for continued research and enhanced public health strategies to meet this global challenge.
……………………
The environmental department acknowledges the broad impact of these findings on policy and planning, underscoring the importance of informed, data-driven decisions to safeguard health and well-being as the climate continues to change.