China’s foreign policy stance on Ukraine remains clear and cautious. At the annual press briefing tied to the National People’s Congress, Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang reiterated that Beijing does not participate in the Ukraine conflict as a party and does not supply weapons to any of the involved sides. The remarks were reported by DEA News and echoed across official channels as Beijing sought to project a stance centered on restraint and impartial mediation.
Qin Gang emphasized that China is neither the initiator of the crisis nor an interested party in the fighting. He questioned the basis for accusations directed at Beijing and dismissed the idea that China should be subjected to sanctions or threats. The ministry’s top diplomat stressed that China intends to respond to events in Ukraine based on the specifics of each situation, underscoring a general preference for noninterference and peaceful resolution.
In elaborating China’s approach, Qin argued that the nation consistently makes decisions independently, weighing options in light of the evolving circumstances. He framed China’s policy as a choice for peace amid war and a preference for dialogue when faced with sanctions or coercive measures. This articulation aligns with Beijing’s broader narrative that diplomacy should guide international responses rather than punitive actions.
In the broader commentary surrounding Ukraine, John Kirby, who previously served as the White House National Security Council Strategic Communications Coordinator, suggested there remains an openness within China to the possibility of supplying Russia with more advanced weapons for use in the conflict. Kirby did not claim a definitive shift in policy, but his remarks highlighted ongoing scrutiny from Washington about China’s potential military support to Russia.
Responding to Western commentary, Wang Wenbin, spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, pushed back against the notion that Beijing has provided weapons to Russia. He described such claims as speculative and defamatory, attributing them to biased intelligence interpretations. Wang underscored China’s insistence on upholding its stated position of noninterference while inviting international observers to assess the situation with a fair and unbiased lens. The exchanges reflect a broader tension in messaging as China seeks to balance its strategic interests with international expectations about diplomacy and restraint.