A court in Bryansk has confirmed a second criminal case opened against Dmitry Afanaskin, the father of a student at gymnasium No. 5 who carried out a school shooting. The information was reported by a state news agency. The new case focuses on alleged encouragement of suicide and carries important legal implications for the family as authorities pursue accountability for the broader factors surrounding the incident.
According to the court, Afanaskin did not plead guilty to the charge of incitement to suicide and declined to testify when questioned. The decision highlights a complex legal process in which prosecutors argue that a parent’s actions may have influenced the events, while defense attorneys contend that the evidence does not prove intent. The proceedings illustrate how cases of this type depend on how influence and responsibility within a family are interpreted.
Earlier coverage by a Telegram channel suggested a new criminal file was opened against Afanaskin on the basis that he allowed his daughter to be exposed to dangerous influences, potentially exposing him to a lengthy prison term if the charges are proven. The report notes that the possible sentence could be lengthy, underscoring the seriousness with which authorities view parental involvement in such acts and the broader implications for school safety protocols.
In addition to the new case, prosecutors had previously filed a suit alleging negligent storage of weapons. It is claimed that a 16 gauge Bekas-3 shotgun was accessible within the residence and that insufficient safety measures may have allowed a minor to access the weapon. The case highlights ongoing scrutiny of how firearms are stored at home and the responsibilities of guardians to prevent access by children, especially in households with school-age children.
On the day of the incident, a student arrived at school with a firearm and opened fire on classmates, resulting in two fatalities including the student herself. Reports indicate that metal detector frames within the school building were nonfunctional at the time, and staff later noted that protective equipment had been covered as part of preparations for a wreath-laying ceremony. The combination of a malfunctioning safety system and maintenance gaps has spurred renewed discussions about school security measures and continued investments in safety infrastructure to prevent future tragedies.
Following the incident, discussions have intensified about the approach to school safety across the country. Earlier statements suggested that a proposed bill addressing school bullying would be introduced in the parliamentary chamber before the year ends, signaling a broader reform effort aimed at reducing violence in educational settings and strengthening protective procedures for students and staff. The evolving Bryansk case remains a focal point for policymakers and the public as authorities balance accountability, prevention, and the welfare of children in the wake of such events.